Modality, probability, and rationality : a critical examination of Alvin Plantinga's philosophy
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Modality, probability, and rationality : a critical examination of Alvin Plantinga's philosophy
(American university studies, Series 5 . Philosophy ; v. 129)
P. Lang, c1992
Available at 3 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Revision of author's doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Nebraska
Includes bibliographical references (p. [185]-192)
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This work examines several major projects in Plantinga's career, particularly as they relate to his defense of the rationality of theistic belief. Chapters are dedicated to his modal ontological argument, his free will defense, his attacks on inductive arguments from evil, and his Reformed epistemology program, in which he argues that theistic belief can be rational without reliance on propositional evidence. Along the way the book deals with important issues in possible worlds semantics, probability theory, and the theory of knowledge. Account is taken of Plantinga's most recent work, including his forthcoming books in epistemology. Though some portions of the work deal with technical concepts of modal and probabilistic logics, all professional philosophers and many professional theologians should find the book accessible, understandable, and informative.
Table of Contents
Contents: An examination of key elements of Plantinga's philosophy, including his modal ontological argument, his free will defense, his rejection of inductive arguments from evil, and his epistemology of religious beliefs. This book distinguishes between epistemic and metaphysical possibility, and shows how this distinction figures into the success of some parts of Plantiga's work, and the failure or incompleteness of others.
by "Nielsen BookData"