Intentionality in Husserl and Heidegger : the problem of the original method and phenomenon of phenomenology
著者
書誌事項
Intentionality in Husserl and Heidegger : the problem of the original method and phenomenon of phenomenology
(Contributions to phenomenology, v. 11)
Kluwer Academic Publishers, c1993
大学図書館所蔵 全22件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 291-294) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
1. Remarks on the Current Status of the Problematic. The literature treating the relationship between the phenomenologies of Husserl and Heidegger has not been kind to Husserl. Heidegger's "devastating" phenomenologically ontological critique of traditional epistemology and ontology, advanced under the rubric of "fundamental ontology" in Being and Time, has almost been universallyl received, despite the paucity of its references to Husserl, as sounding the death knell for Husserl's original formulation of phenomenology. The recent publication of Heidegger's lectures from the period surrounding his composition of Being and Time, lectures that contain detailed references and critical analyses of Husserl's phenomenology, and which, in the words of one respected commentator, Rudolf Bernet, "offer at long last, insight into the principal sources of fundamental ontology,"2 will, if 3 the conclusions reached by the same commentator are any indication, serve only to reinforce the perception of Heidegger's phenomenological /I superiority" over Husserl. This is not to suggest that the tendency toward Heidegger partisan ship in the literature treating the relationship of his phenomenology to Husserl's has its basis in extra-philosophical or extra-phenome nological concerns and considerations. Rather, it is to draw attention to the undeniable 'fact' that Heidegger's reformulation of Husserl's phenomenology has cast a "spell" over all subsequent discussions of the basic problems and issues involved in what has become known as their "controversy.
目次
Introduction. Part One: Husserl's Phenomenological Account of Intentionality. One: Husserl's Phenomenological Method. Two: The Intentionality of Logical Significance and Material Ontological Meaning. Three: The Intentionality of Psychologically Pure Consciousness. Four: The Intentionality of Transcendentally Pure Consciousness. Part Two: Heidegger's Phenomenological Account of Intentionality. Five: Heidegger's Concept of Phenomenology. Six: The Phenomenological Inquiry into the Being of Intentionality. Seven: Being in the World Manifests Dasein's Original Transcendence. Eight: The Temporal Meaning of Transcendence. Part Three: The Confrontation of Husserl's and Heidegger's Accounts of Intentionality. Nine: The Phenomenological Method: Reflective or Hermeneutical? Ten: Intentionality: an Original or Derived Phenomenon? Part Four: Discussion of the Conclusions. Eleven: Gadamer's Assessment of the Controversy between Husserl and Heidegger. Twelve: Ricoeur's Attempted Rapprochement between Phenomenology and Hermeneutics. Thirteen: Mohanty's Account of the Complementarity of Descriptive and Interpretive Phenomenology. Fourteen: Crowell's Account of Husserl's and Heidegger's Divergent Interpretations of Phenomenology's Transcendental Character. Fifteen: Landgrebe's Critique of Husserl's Theory of Phenomenological Reflection. Table of Abbreviations. Notes. Selected Bibliography. Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より