Progress in new cosmologies : beyond the big bang
著者
書誌事項
Progress in new cosmologies : beyond the big bang
Plenum Press, c1993
大学図書館所蔵 全11件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
"Proceedings of the Thirteenth Cracow Summer School of Cosmology on Progress in New Cosmologies, held under the auspices of the Omega Foundation and Apeiron, September 7-12, 1992, at the Physics Institute, University of Lódź, Lódź, Poland"--T.p. verso
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The Hidden Hypotheses Behind the Big Bang It is quite unavoidable that many philosophical a priori assumptions lurk behind the debate between supporters of the Big Bang and the anti-BB camp. The same battle has been waged in physics between the determinists and the opposing viewpoint. Therefore, by way of introduction to this symposium, I would like to discuss, albeit briefly, the many "hypotheses", essentially of a metaphysical nature, which are often used without being clearly stated. The first hypothesis is the idea that the Universe has some origin, or origins. Opposing this is the idea that the Universe is eternal, essentially without beginning, no matter how it might change-the old Platonic system, opposed by an Aristote lian view! Or Pope Pius XII or Abbe Lemaitre or Friedmann versus Einstein or Hoyle or Segal, etc. The second hypothesis is the need for a "minimum of hypotheses" -the sim plicity argument. One is expected to account for all the observations with a mini mum number of hypotheses or assumptions. In other words, the idea is to "save the phenomena", and this has been an imperative since the time of Plato and Aristotle. But numerous contradictions have arisen between the hypotheses and the facts. This has led some scientists to introduce additional entities, such as the cosmologi cal constant, dark matter, galaxy mergers, complicated geometries, and even a rest mass for the photon. Some of the proponents of the latter idea were Einstein, de Broglie, Findlay-Freundlich, and later Vigier and myself.
目次
Fitting Theory to Observation-From Stars to Cosmology (H. Arp). Redshift Periodicity in the Local Supercluster (W.M. Napier, B.N.G. Guthrie). Compact Groups of Galaxies (J.W. Sulentic). Is There Matter in Voids? (B. Wszolek). Redshifts and Arplike Configurations in the Local Group (M. Zabierowski). Are the Galaxies Really Receding? (F.L. Walker). The Case Against the Big Bang (E.J. Lerner). De Sitter Redshift (J.B. Miller, T.E. Miller). Equilibrium Cosmology (T. Jaakkola). A SteadyState Cosmology (A.K.T. Assis). Cosmological Principles (K. Rudnicki). The Meta Model (T. Van Flandern). Dark Matter, Spiral Arms, and Giant Comets (S.V.M. Clube). Active Galactic Nuclei (P.F. Browne). Computer Simulations of Galaxies (W. Peter et al.). Are There GammaRay Burst Sources at Cosmological Distances? (W. Tkaczyk). Gamma Ray Emission Regions in AGNs (S. Triphonova, A. Lagutin). 5 additional articles. Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より