The fatherhood of God from Origen to Athanasius
著者
書誌事項
The fatherhood of God from Origen to Athanasius
(Oxford theological monographs)
Clarendon Press, 1994
大学図書館所蔵 全5件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Revision of thesis (doctoral)--University of Oxford
Includes bibliographical references and indexes
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The fatherhood of God has had a central, if increasingly controversial, place in Christian thinking about God. Yet, although Christians referred to God as Father from the earliest days of the faith, it was not until Athanasius in the 4th century that the idea of God as Father became a topic of sustained analysis. Looking at the genesis of Athanasius' understanding of divine fatherhood against the background of Alexandrian tradition, Dr Widdicombe demonstrates how the concept came to occupy such a prominent place in Christian theology. He argues that there is a continuity in the Alexandrian tradition which runs from Origen to Athanasius, and shows how, in the detail of their language and in the structure of their arguments, the 3rd- and 4th-century Alexandrians, Arius excepted, drew on Origen's portrayal of God as Father. For Origen, the fatherhood of God lay at the heart of the Christian faith: to know God fully and thus to be saved is to know God as Father. For Athanasius, the fatherhood of God was integral to the defence of the divinity of the Son against the Arian challenge.
Fatherhood identified God as the loving and fruitful source of all things, and as the one who has sought to meet us in his Son Jesus Christ. The book makes a significant contribution to understanding the place of the Arian controversy in the development of early-Christian doctrine by showing that on this fundamental topic, Arius lies outside the mainstream of Alexandrian thought. Whilst for Arius it was logically possible to refer to God without calling him Father, this was not possible for either Origen or Athanasius. In the context of modern debates about describing God as Father, this examination of early-Christian thinking should help people to consider whether it is desirable or possible to call God Father if an intelligible doctrine of God is to be maintained.
目次
- Part 1 Origen - Father, Son and salvation: the doctrine of God
- the revelation of the Son and the names of God
- eternal Father and eternal Son
- the knowledge of God as Father and adoption as Sons
- Origen - conclusion. Part 2 The fatherhood of God in the Alexandrian tradition to 325: after Origen
- before Nicaea. Part 3 Athanasius - Father, Son and salvation: background - philosophy, doctrine of scripture
- God as Father
- Father and Son
- adoption, salvation and the life of unity.
「Nielsen BookData」 より