The institution of theory
著者
書誌事項
The institution of theory
John Hopkins Univesity Press, 1994
- : hc
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全10件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
A revised, expanded version of the lectures delivered at the Academia Sinica, Taipei
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
During at least the past decade, violent controversy in the humanities has been generated by the increasingly dominant role played by theory - and Murray Krieger has been a central player in establishing theory's current imperial dominion. In "The Institution of Theory", he examines the process by which theory has become institutionalized in the American academy and the consequences of theory as an academic institution. He traces the transformation of "literary" theory into "critical" theory and relates it to changes in the place of literature within questions about discourse at large. And he faces the cost as well as the gains of the recent denial of privilege to the literary. What, he asks, is the future of the languages of the humanities now that criticism, no longer just one of several literary activities, makes its all-encompassing claims as an imperializing institution? To support his view of the issues at stake in current theoretical debate, Krieger surveys both the history of American criticism and the general history of theory in the West.
He sees divisions in each of them that foreshadow the current debates: in the first, a conflict between the social and the aesthetic functions of literature, and in the second a conflict between the treatment of literature as a reflection of a culture's ideology and the treatment of a literature as a subversion of that ideology. To what extent, he asks, are our debates new and to what extent are they merely refashioned versions of those we have always had with us? Recent years have seen an ugly polarization of almost all discourse concerning the humanities, as even moderate statements have been charged with being representative of one extreme or the other. Despite this risk, Krieger has added his own moderate voice, in hopes of attracting a balanced response that would encourage the expansion of the range of texts for study, together with an expansion into the political of our ways of studying them, while still recognizing and responding to the special powers of the literary to open our culture to such expansions.
目次
Preface
Chapter 1. Institutionalizing Theory: From Literary Criticism to Literary Theory to Critical Theory
Chapter 2. Two Faces of an Old Argument: History versus Formalism in American Criticism
Chapter 3. The Ideological Imperative and Counterideological Resistance
Chapter 4. A Hortatory Conclusion
Notes
Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より