The institution of theory
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
The institution of theory
John Hopkins Univesity Press, 1994
- : hc
- : pbk
Available at 10 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
A revised, expanded version of the lectures delivered at the Academia Sinica, Taipei
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
During at least the past decade, violent controversy in the humanities has been generated by the increasingly dominant role played by theory - and Murray Krieger has been a central player in establishing theory's current imperial dominion. In "The Institution of Theory", he examines the process by which theory has become institutionalized in the American academy and the consequences of theory as an academic institution. He traces the transformation of "literary" theory into "critical" theory and relates it to changes in the place of literature within questions about discourse at large. And he faces the cost as well as the gains of the recent denial of privilege to the literary. What, he asks, is the future of the languages of the humanities now that criticism, no longer just one of several literary activities, makes its all-encompassing claims as an imperializing institution? To support his view of the issues at stake in current theoretical debate, Krieger surveys both the history of American criticism and the general history of theory in the West.
He sees divisions in each of them that foreshadow the current debates: in the first, a conflict between the social and the aesthetic functions of literature, and in the second a conflict between the treatment of literature as a reflection of a culture's ideology and the treatment of a literature as a subversion of that ideology. To what extent, he asks, are our debates new and to what extent are they merely refashioned versions of those we have always had with us? Recent years have seen an ugly polarization of almost all discourse concerning the humanities, as even moderate statements have been charged with being representative of one extreme or the other. Despite this risk, Krieger has added his own moderate voice, in hopes of attracting a balanced response that would encourage the expansion of the range of texts for study, together with an expansion into the political of our ways of studying them, while still recognizing and responding to the special powers of the literary to open our culture to such expansions.
Table of Contents
Preface
Chapter 1. Institutionalizing Theory: From Literary Criticism to Literary Theory to Critical Theory
Chapter 2. Two Faces of an Old Argument: History versus Formalism in American Criticism
Chapter 3. The Ideological Imperative and Counterideological Resistance
Chapter 4. A Hortatory Conclusion
Notes
Index
by "Nielsen BookData"