Academic literacy and the nature of expertise : reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy
著者
書誌事項
Academic literacy and the nature of expertise : reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy
Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., c1994
- : alk. paper
- pbk. : alk. paper
大学図書館所蔵 全8件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The first full-length account integrating both the cognitive and sociological aspects of reading and writing in the academy, this unique volume covers educational research on reading and writing, rhetorical research on writing in the disciplines, cognitive research on expertise in ill-defined problems, and sociological and historical research on the professions.
The author produced this volume as a result of a research program aimed at understanding the relationship between two concepts -- literacy and expertise -- which traditionally have been treated as quite separate phenomena. A burgeoning literature on reading and writing in the academy has begun to indicate fairly consistent patterns in how students acquire literacy practices. This literature shows, furthermore, that what students do is quite distinct from what experts do. While many have used these results as a starting point for teaching students "how to be expert," the author has chosen instead to ask about the interrelationship between expert and novice practice, seeing them both as two sides of the same project: a cultural-historical "professionalization project" aimed at establishing and preserving the professional privilege.
The consequences of this "professionalization project" are examined using the discipline of academic philosophy as the "site" for the author's investigations. Methodologically unique, these investigations combine rhetorical analysis, protocol analysis, and the analysis of classroom discourse. The result is a complex portrait of how the participants in this humanistic discipline use their academic literacy practices to construct and reconstruct a great divide between expert and lay knowledge. This monograph thus extends our current understanding of the rhetoric of the professions and examines its implications for education.
目次
Contents: Preface. Part I: Core Concepts. Literacy Among Experts in the Academy: The Academic Professions. Literacy Among Novices in the Academy: Students in School. Expertise as Cognitive Abstraction. Expertise as Professionalized Knowledge. Literacy and the Nature of Expertise. Part II: Studying Space and Time. Observing Writers with Protocol Data. Modeling Writing as Activity. Part III: Studies at a Single Site of Academic Literacy: Philosophical Ethics. Design and Analytic Framework for These Studies. The Genre of the Philosophic Essay: Transforming Readers' Experience. Composing the Philosophic Essay: Transforming Everyday Conversation. Representing Philosophical Ethics: Transforming Everyday Narrative. At the Boundaries of Expertise: Transforming Apprenticeship in an Instructional Situation. Part IV: Reflection and Reform. Reflecting on Academic Literacy. Reforming Academic Literacy. Appendices: Chronological Bibliography of the Cognitive Process Tradition. Directions for "Thinking-Aloud" Protocols. Interview Guide for Experts and Novices. Interview Guide for the Teacher. Interview Guide for the Students. The Career of William James. Participants' Final Texts. Rules for the Analysis of Text Structure. Chronological Listing of Participants' Narratives. Rules for Aggregating Conversational Interchanges. Coding the World of Discourse. Week-by-Week Analysis of the Class.
「Nielsen BookData」 より