Regulating broadcast programming
著者
書誌事項
Regulating broadcast programming
(AEI studies in telecommunications deregulation)
MIT Press , AEI Press, c1994
大学図書館所蔵 全21件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. [333]-348
Includes indexes
内容説明・目次
内容説明
"Broadcast content regulation has failed miserably, and will continue to fail," claim the authors of "Regulating Broadcast Programming", in their comprehensive review of past and present efforts to regulate the content of radio and television. They argue that such regulation should be based on the same principles used for print media, where control of editorial content lies in private hands instead of the government. Access - the ability to reach the willing recipient by the communicator willing to pay the costs - should not be controlled by a third party. In a gradually unfolding analysis, Krattenmaker and Powe look at the wide variety of constitutional, historical, economic and common sense issues that content control generates. Chapter one, covering the period from 1912 to the early 1940s, explains the origins of US federal regulation of the broadcast industry and why some regulatory strategies were adopted and others discarded. Chapter two explains how normative economic theory might portray the appropriate role for governmental regulation of a peculiar type of product called a "public good."
The four chapters that follow review the principal content regulations - regulations designed to expand programme choices and those designed to excise certain types of programmes - and the statutory and constitutional standards under which broadcast licensees operate. The final four chapters provide an extensive and detailed critical analysis of broadcast content regulation, culminating in the authors' proposal for reinventing broadcast regulation. In the concluding chapter they outline a radically different set of legal and regulatory policies and principles for regulating broadcast programme content. These are the rules used for governing all other mass media in the United States.
目次
- The regulatory scheme created - the Radio Act of 1912, Herbert Hoover and the early growth of radio, the rise and fall of Hoover's policy, the Radio Act of 1927, the Federal Radio commission, the commission and the courts
- market failure - framework for defining "public interest", potential sources of market failure, the limits of competition, broadcasters' special access to a unique resource
- diversity - minimum diversity levels, diversifying program mix, outlet and source diversity
- conformity - sex, drugs, violence, advertising, conclusion
- the public interest - the malleable public interest, the creation of the public trustee image
- broadcasting and the Supreme Court - overview, the early cases, the NBC case, the Red Lion case, the League of Women Voters case, the Pacifica case
- broadcasting versus print - scarcity, intrusion, power, public property, equality without a difference
- the fairness doctrine - costs, benefits, effects and alternatives, doctrinal incoherence
- regulatory failure - markets, competition, technology
- reinventing broadcast regulation - television's critics, the problems for the critics, the appropriate scope of the regulation.
「Nielsen BookData」 より