Ranking hazardous-waste sites for remedial action

著者

書誌事項

Ranking hazardous-waste sites for remedial action

Committee on Remedial Action Priorities for Hazardous Waste Sites, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, National Research Council

National Academy Pr., c1994

  • pbk.

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全1件

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Committee chairman: Perry L. McCarty

Includes bibliographical references (p. 279-294)

内容説明・目次

内容説明

The United States may not be able to make all hazardous-waste sites as clean as possible. Therefore, priorities must be set for the timing of waste site remediations. This book assesses several of the government's methods of ranking sites for remediation and compares the performance of three such models using input data developed from the same set of waste sites. Because inconsistent methods may be neither effective nor prudent, the book recommends that the government consider developing a unified national approach to setting priorities to replace the current multiple approaches. Table of Contents FRONT MATTER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 HAZARDOUS-WASTE SITE PROBLEMS IN THE UNITED STATES 2 PRIORITY-SETTING PROCESSES 3 CLASSIFICATION OF PRIORITY-SETTING APPROACHES 4 EPA'S PRIORITY SETTING 5 DOD'S PRIORITY SETTING 6 DOE'S PRIORITY SETTING 7 STATE PRIORITY SETTING 8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS 9 TOWARD A UNIFIED NATIONAL APPROACH 10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REFERENCES

目次

  • 1 FRONT MATTER
  • 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  • 3 1 HAZARDOUS-WASTE SITE PROBLEMS IN THE UNITED STATES
  • 4 2 PRIORITY-SETTING PROCESSES
  • 5 3 CLASSIFICATION OF PRIORITY-SETTING APPROACHES
  • 6 4 EPA'S PRIORITY SETTING
  • 7 5 DOD'S PRIORITY SETTING
  • 8 6 DOE'S PRIORITY SETTING
  • 9 7 STATE PRIORITY SETTING
  • 10 8 COMPARING FEDERAL RANKING MODELS
  • 11 9 TOWARD A UNIFIED NATIONAL APPROACH
  • 12 10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 13 REFERENCES

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報

ページトップへ