Autobiographical quests : Augustine, Montaigne, Rousseau, and Wordsworth
著者
書誌事項
Autobiographical quests : Augustine, Montaigne, Rousseau, and Wordsworth
University Press of Virginia, c1994
大学図書館所蔵 全10件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 171-177) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
How reliable is the history that human memory produces? Does the self, creating for others, become other? Elizabeth de Mijolla approaches these questions using a descriptive, nonprescriptive approach to the writings of four notable autobiographers: the early Church Father Augustine; the Renaissance essayist Montaigne; the French Romantic philosopher Rousseau; and the English Romantic poet Wordsworth. Exploring theories of memory, time, and autobiographical design and disorder, she argues against the imperative of traditional mimesis and instead, for the variety of autobiographical renderings that personal memory permits. Autobiographers writing rational retrospective narratives may depict their lives in accepted literary designs. But these designs can be undone by the inclusion of irrational reveries, varying visions, or other obscure memories. And these incongruities impose independent meanings upon the autobiographical stories.
Discussing Augustine's "Confessions", Montaigne's "Essays", Rousseau's "Confessions" (along with the "Dialogues" and "Reveries"), and Wordsworth's "Prelude", Mijolla demonstrates the necessity of revisionary autobiography for authors who acknowledge the irrational, the variable, and the ineffable. Mijolla sees the central tension of autobiography as springing from the two impulses vying for supremacy - mimesis, orderly and sequential; and memory, achronological and emotional: one or the other prevails, in varying degrees, to individualise both form and outlook. Augustine is presented as the classical embodiment of the rigorously mimetic school, and his work offers a single take on the past - conversion to wisdom. Montaigne, Rousseau, and Wordsworth represent a spectrum of divergence from strict temporal order into the territories of memory and the writing moment. They offer double takes on the past that are comprised of both past and present understanding.
In allowing the idiosyncrasies of memory into their autobiographies, they must navigate between traditional mimetic form and the transgressions of personal experience, with the result that established autobiographical forms are reworked and individual beliefs reconsidered.
「Nielsen BookData」 より