Hung jury : the diary of a Menéndez juror
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Hung jury : the diary of a Menéndez juror
Temple University Press, 1995
- : cloth
- : paper
Available at / 2 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
- Volume
-
: cloth ISBN 9781566393935
Description
More than two decades after serving as a juror on the high-profile seven-month murder trial People v. Erik Galen Menendez, Hazel Thornton updates her book Hung Jury with a new preface and a postscript essay of observations about the Menendez brothers' second trial. Includes psychological commentary by Lawrence S. Wrightsman and Amy J. Posey, and legal commentary by Alan Scheflin.
Table of Contents
Foreword --Hazel Thornton The Diary of a Menendez Juror * People v. Erik Galen Menendez: A Summary of the Case Chronology of Events Trial Participants People v. Erik Galen Menendez: The Diary of Juror 9 1. Jury Selection, June 28-July 19, 1993 2. Opening Statements, July 20, 1993 3. The Prosecution's Case, July 20-August 16, 1993 4. The Defense's Case, August 16-November 18, 1993 5. Rebuttal Phase, November 19-December 3, 1993 6. Closing Arguments, December 6-15, 1993 7. Deliberations, December 15, 1993-January 13, 1994 8. Post-Trial, January 13-16, 1994 Commentaries Psychological Commentary on the Diary --Lawrence S. Wrightsman and Amy J. Posey Legal Commentary on the Diary --Alan W. Scheflin About the Author and Commentators Index
- Volume
-
: paper ISBN 9781566393942
Description
It is Wednesday, November 17, 1993. Okay, now we've heard the tape, the real 'confession' tape in which Dr. Oziel recorded part of an actual session with the boys, with their cooperation, on 12/11/89. This is supposedly the most damaging evidence against them but, in my own mind, the way things have been developed over the past four months, it only served to strengthen their defense! True, they never directly mentioned self defense or abuse on the tape, but it could be construed (and was construed by Ms. Abramson and Dr. Burgess) that there were many allusions to both...The taped session was very unprofessional and non-therapeutic and it is clear to me that Oziel was trying to provoke them into saying incriminating things. On June 28, 1993 Hazel Thornton showed up for the first day of jury selection. She didn't know she would spend the next seven months as a juror on one of the year's most high-profile murder trials: The People v. Erik Menendez. Erik Menendez and his brother Lyle were on trial for shot-gunning their parents to death in their Beverly Hills home.
Hazel Thornton began keeping her journal as a way of getting the trial out of her system every day, so she could sleep at night without being haunted by the day's testimony. And, sworn to shoulder the burden of silence, she also used the journal to help sort out the barrage of details. A behind the scenes witness, Thornton describes with lucidity, charm, and humor the day-to-day experiences of a juror: the riveting emotional testimonies, the deluge of minutiae, and the unpleasant graphic evidence. Going far beyond the reportage of the print or electronic media, her diary gets inside the thoughts, discussions, and actions of the jury, and the trial process itself. She writes about the jury's deliberations, and eventual dead-lock, with revelatory insight into what really happens on a 'hung jury'. Author note: Hazel Thornton is a senior Engineer at Pacific Bell in Pasadena, California. Lawrence S. Wrightsman is Professor of Psychology at the University of Kansas. Amy J. Posey holds a M.A. in Social Psychology from the University of Kansas. Alan W. Scheflin is Professor of Law at Santa Clara University Law School.
Table of Contents
Foreword Hazel Thornton The Diary of a Menendez Juror People v. Erik Galen Menendez: A Summary of the Case Chronology of Events Trial Participants People v. Erik Galen Menendez: The Diary of Juror 9 1. Jury Selection, June 28-July 19, 1993 2. Opening Statements, July 20, 1993 3. The Prosecution's Case, July 20-August 16, 1993 4. The Defense's Case, August 16-November 18, 1993 5. Rebuttal Phase, November 19-December 3, 1993 6. Closing Arguments, December 6-15, 1993 7. Deliberations, December 15, 1993-January 13, 1994 8. Post-Trial, January 13-16, 1994 Commentaries Psychological Commentary on the Diary Lawrence S. Wrightsman and Amy J. Posey Legal Commentary on the Diary Alan W. Scheflin About the Author and Commentators Index
by "Nielsen BookData"
