Family centres & bringing up young children
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Family centres & bringing up young children
H.M.S.O, c1996
Available at 10 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p.195-202
On t.p.: The Children's Society
On cover: Department of Health
Description and Table of Contents
Description
The development of family centres is of importance in the work of the Children's Society and other voluntary organizations, as well as the statutory sector, particularly following the Children Act. But are they an effective way of providing services for families with young children? This study of users' views in six family centres, carried out between 1988 and 1992, attempts to answer that question. Based on data from questionnaires, interviews and observation, the study describes users' views on bringing up young children in the six areas. It also gives their views on the aims and impact of the centres, and the extent of user participation.
Table of Contents
- What are family projects? - research and policy
- family projects, prevention and need
- six projects and their areas - aspects of disadvantage
- six projects and their users - why did people use the projects and what did they do there?
- who uses the projects? - a user profile
- bringing up young children in the six areas
- aims and impacts - workers' and users' views of the projects 1
- aims and impacts - workers' and users' views of the projects 2
- empowerment and participation - structure or style?
by "Nielsen BookData"