Left out : pragmatism, exceptionalism, and the poverty of American Marxism, 1890-1922
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Left out : pragmatism, exceptionalism, and the poverty of American Marxism, 1890-1922
(New studies in American intellectual and cultural history)
Johns Hopkins University Press, c1997
Available at 22 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
"Bibliographical essay": p. [453]-461
Includes index: p. [463]-472
Description and Table of Contents
Description
"Why is there no socialism in the United States?" This age-old question, writes Brian Lloyd, can best be dealt with by rephrasing it. In this provocative rethinking of American radicalism, Lloyd asks instead: "What happened to Marx's methods and concepts when American radicals tried to put them into practice?" To answer this question, Lloyd offers a detailed analysis of the Marxian doctrine that Debs-era socialists tried to understand and put to use in changing American society. He highlights the amiable relationship that developed between Marxism and pragmatism, showing how this courtship ultimately impoverished the radicals who cultivated it. Trying to gain a foothold in the struggle to shape American society and social science in the early 20th century, Marxists invigorated American liberalism while at the same time placing themselves on the fringe of liberal discourse and rendering themselves irrelevant. Whether in the name of Darwin or Dewey, those who claimed to be squaring Marxism with "American reality" succeeded only in creating American verions of the petty bourgeois socialism that Marx had castigated in 1848.
The poverty of American Marxism, Lloyd concludes, was above all an ideological condition - the result of radicals' having imbibed far too little, rather than too much, of the Marxism of Marx.
by "Nielsen BookData"