Still seeing red : how the Cold War shapes the new American politics
著者
書誌事項
Still seeing red : how the Cold War shapes the new American politics
(Transforming American politics series)
Westview Press, c1997
大学図書館所蔵 全10件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Who are we today when as children we practiced hiding under our school desks or filing down to the bomb shelter? Still Seeing Red explores a heretofore little-examined aspect of the Cold Warnamely, how the Cold War molded the internal politics of the United States. Arguing that the Republican party was the primary beneficiary of the struggle with communism, John Kenneth White examines how this success was grounded on two contradictory aspects of American politics: our fanatical preoccupation with communism and a robust liberalism. Well after the collapse of communism, the ideology of the Cold War continues to affect civil rights, social welfare, education, technology policy, and many other policy arenas. The paperback edition features an all new chapter which addresses recently uncovered evidence of the impact of the Cold War on domestic politics and electionsback then, today, and beyond. }In Still Seeing Red, John Kenneth White explores how the Cold War molded the internal politics of the United States.
In a powerful narrative backed by a rich treasure trove of polling data, White takes the reader through the Cold War years, describing its effect in redrawing the electoral map as we came to know it after World War II. The primary beneficiaries of the altered landscape were reinvigorated Republicans who emerged after five successive defeats to tar the Democrats with the soft on communism epithet. A new nationalist Republican partywhose Cold War prescription for winning the White House was copyrighted to Dwight Eisenhower, Richard M. Nixon, Barry Goldwater, and Ronald Reaganattained primacy in presidential politics because of two contradictory impulses embedded in the American character: a fanatical preoccupation with communism and a robust liberalism. From 1952 to 1988 Republicans won the presidency seven times in ten tries. The rare Democratic victorsJohn F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Jimmy Carterattempted to rearm the Democratic party to fight the Cold War. Their collective failure says much about the politics of the period.
Even so, the Republican dream of becoming a majority party became perverted as the Grand Old Party was recast into a top-down party routinely winning the presidency even as its electoral base remained relatively stagnant.In the postCold War era, Americans are coming to appreciate how the fifty-year struggle with the Soviet Union organized thinking in such diverse areas as civil rights, social welfare, education, and defense policy. At the same time, Americans are also more aware of how the Cold War shaped their livesfrom the duck and cover drills in the classrooms to the bomb shelters dug in the backyard when most Baby Boomers were growing up. Like millions of Baby Boomers, Bill Clinton can truthfully say, I am a child of the Cold War. With the last gasp of the Soviet Union, Baby Boomers and others are learning that the politics of the Cold War are hard to shed. As the electoral maps are being redrawn once more in the Clinton years, landmarks left behind by the Cold War provide an important reference point.
In the height of the Cold War, voters divided the world into us noncommunists versus them communists and reduced contests for the presidency into battles of which party would be tougher in dealing with the Evil Empire. But in a convoluted postCold War era, politics defies such simple characteristics and presidents find it harder to lead. Recalling how John F. Kennedy could so easily rally public opinion, an exasperated Bill Clinton once lamented, Gosh, I miss the Cold War. } In the postCold War era, Americans are coming to appreciate how the fifty-year struggle with the Soviet Union organized thinking in such diverse areas as civil rights, social welfare, education, and defense policy. In Still Seeing Red, John Kenneth White explores how the Cold War molded the internal politics of the United States. In a powerful narrative, White takes the reader through the Cold War years, describing its effect in redrawing the electoral map as we came to know it after World War II. The primary beneficiaries of the altered landscape were reinvigorated Republicans who emerged to tar the Democrats with the soft on communism epithet.
A new nationalist Republican party attained primacy in presidential politics because of two contradictory impulses embedded in the American character: a fanatical preoccupation with communism and a robust liberalism. The rare Democratic victors attempted to rearm the Democratic party to fight the Cold War. Their collective failure says much about the politics of the period.As the electoral maps are being redrawn once more in the Clinton years, landmarks left behind by the Cold War provide an important reference point. In the height of the Cold War, voters reduced contests for the presidency into battles of which party would be tougher in dealing with the Evil Empire. But in a convoluted postCold War era, politics defies such simple characteristics. Recalling how John F. Kennedy could so easily rally public opinion, an exasperated Bill Clinton once lamented, Gosh, I miss the Cold War.
目次
Introduction: Who Are We? Cold War Fears And Party Response19451946: Lost Innocence19471950: The New Politics of Old Fears1952: The Transforming Election The Cold War Party SystemThe Nationalist RepublicansThe Divided Democrats Diminished Parties In Search Of A New PoliticsHigh Anxiety: PostCold War PoliticsThe Collapse of the Old OrderThe Shape of Things to Come
「Nielsen BookData」 より