Rationing : Talk and action in health care
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Rationing : Talk and action in health care
BMJ Pub. Group, 1997
Available at 10 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This unique publication, co-published with the King's Fund, is about talk and action in health care rationing. It presents the latest thinking and practical experience in rationing today. Read about why rationing is inevitable, look at what the public thinks, and decide for yourself what action should be taken in the future
Table of Contents
- Introduction and context: introduction, Bill New
- The rationing agenda in the NHS, Bill New
- Responses to the rationing agenda, Jo Lenaghan. Section 1 Talk: The inevitability of rationing in the NHS, Chris Heginbotham
- Public opinion and rationing - a review of the evidence, Jack Kneeshaw. The rationing debate: Devising a package of health care services the NHS is responsible for - for, Bill New
- against, Rudolph Kelin
- Maximising the health of the whole community - for, A.J. Culyer
- against, John Harris
- Rationing health care by age - for, Alan Williams
- against, J. Grimley Evans
- Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions - for, Jo Lenaghan
- against, Stephen Harrison
- Rationing within the NHS should be explicit - for, Len Doyal
- against, Jo Coast
- Direct public and patient involvement in rationing - the possibilities for direct public involvement, Anna Coote
- - the possibilities for direct patient involvement, Heather Goodare
- The moral limits to public and patient involvement, Len Doyal. Section 2 Action: New Zealand priority criteria project, Hadorn, Holmes
- Setting priorities - can Britain learn from Sweden? McKee, Figueras
- Setting priorities - is there a role for citizen's juries? Lenaghan et al
- The Asbury draft policy on ethical use of resources, Crisp et al
- Responses to Asbury proposal, Thomasma et al
- A purchaser experience of managing new, expensive drugs - interferon beta, Rous et al
- How can hospitals ration drugs? Bochner et al
- responses to Boshner et al.
by "Nielsen BookData"