Religion, interpretation, and diversity of belief : the framework model from Kant to Durkheim to Davidson

著者

書誌事項

Religion, interpretation, and diversity of belief : the framework model from Kant to Durkheim to Davidson

Terry F. Godlove, Jr

Mercer University Press, 1997

  • : pbk

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全5件

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Originally published: Cambridge [England] ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 1989

Bibliography: p. 195-202

Includes index

内容説明・目次

内容説明

Often different religious traditions offer very different pictures of the world. In fact, religions are so fascinating partly because they present alternative pictures of the nature of time, space, persons, food, community, life, death, and so on. How are we to make sense of this radical diversity of belief? The most common response is to say that religions are alternative conceptual frameworks or schemes, whose categories organize experience in sometimes diverse ways. On this view of the framework model of religious belief we cannot map religious frameworks onto a single, comprehensive grid because they themselves function as the maps. In this sense, the Buddhist and Baptist are sometimes said to live in different worlds.Religion, Interpretation, and Diversity of Belief traces the history of the framework model from Kant to Durkheim, and then argues for its replacement. Rather than seeing religions as all-encompassing grids, we must recognize that they themseleves are constrained in at least two unavoidable ways: first, by the formal rules that make human experience possible at all, and second, by the fact that as language users we must presuppose that we hold the vast bulk of our beliefs in common. Given these constraints, we can then see religious differences, however dramatic, as relatively limited and largely theoretical.The framework model is deeply entrenched in those disciplines central to the study of religion, especially so in philosophy, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and theology. The negative thrust of this is to suggest this allegiance needs to be reconsidered. Positively, the book sketches a picture of linguistic interpretation on which our differences, religious or otherwise, stand out against the background of what we have in common

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報

ページトップへ