The locative alternation in German : its structure and acquisition
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
The locative alternation in German : its structure and acquisition
(Language acquisition & language disorders / editors, Harald Clahsen, William Rutherford, v. 15)
John Benjamins, c1997
- : Eur
- : US
Available at 27 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. [269]-281
Includes indexes
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This monograph deals with the locative alternation in German, a change in the argument structure of verbs like spray and load. Like most argument structure changes, the alternation is both productive and constrained: new forms may be derived, but not from all candidate verbs. This raises a learnability problem: how can children determine, in the absence of negative evidence, which verbs participate in the alternation? The Locative Alternation in German tries to answer this question by providing an in-depth analysis of the conditions that verbs must meet in order to participate in the alternation. Most importantly, transitive verbs must allow speakers to presuppose the existence of their theme argument. This condition requires the theme to be incremental so that it can be conceived of as nonindividuated (or unbounded) when the verb is used in the alternative syntactic frame. The Nonindividuation Hypothesis splits locative verbs into two types, mass verbs (like spray) and count verbs (like load), and it predicts that children acquire the alternation first for mass verbs, whose theme must be a substance and so is nonindividuated by default. Support for this hypothesis is provided in the empirical part of the book, which also provides evidence against claims in the literature that children acquire the alternation by drawing on an innate Affectness Linking Rule.
Table of Contents
- 1. Argument Structure Alternations and the No Negative Evidence Problem
- 2. Theories of the Acquisition of Argument Structure Alternations
- 3. The Structure of the Locative Alternation
- 4. The Nonindividuation Hypothesis
- 5. The Production Experiment: Testing the Nonindividuation
- 6. Restrictions on be- Prefixation
- 7. The Comprehension Experiment: Testing Children's Interpretation of be- Verbs
- 8. Summary and Conclusions
- 9. Appendices
- 10. References
- 11. Auhtor Index
- 12. Subject Index
by "Nielsen BookData"