Projectile technology
著者
書誌事項
Projectile technology
(Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology)
Plenum Press, c1997
大学図書館所蔵 全10件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Artifacts linked to projectile technologies traditionally have provided the foundations for time-space systematics and cultural-historic frameworks in archaeological research having to do with foragers. With the shift in archae ological research objectives to processual interpretations, projectile technolo gies continue to receive marked attention, but with an emphasis on the implications of variability in such areas as design, function, and material as they relate to the broader questions of human adaptation. The reason that this particular domain of foraging technology persists as an important focus of research, I think, comes in three parts. A projectile technology was a crucial part of most foragers' strategies for survival, it was functionally spe cific, and it generally was fabricated from durable materials likely to be detected archaeologically. Being fundamental to meat acquisition and the principal source of calo ries, projectile technologies were typically afforded greater time-investment, formal modification, and elaboration of attributes than others. Moreover, such technologies tend to display greater standardization because of con straints on size, morphology, and weight that are inherent to the delivery system. The elaboration of attributes and standardization of form gives pro jectile technologies time-and space-sensitivity that is greater than most other foraging technologies. And such sensitivity is immensely valuable in archae ological research.
目次
- Introduction: The History and Development of Projectile Technology Research
- H. Knecht. Factors Influencing the Use of Stone Projectile Tips: An Ethnographic Perspective
- C.J. Ellis. Archaeological Perspectives: Middle Paleolithic Spear Point Technology
- J. Shea. The Microwear and Morphology of Microliths from Gleann Mor
- B. Finlayson, S. Mithen. Side-Notched and Unnotched Arrowpoints: Assessing Functional Differences
- A.L. Christenson. Experimental Perspectives: Contributions of Multidisciplinary Experimentation to the Study of Upper Paleolithic Projectile Points
- J.-M. Geneste, S. Maury. Bone, Antler, and Stone Projectile Points: Experimental Explorations of Manufacture and Use
- H. Knecht. Hunting During the Upper Paleolithic: Spearthrower, Bow, or Both? P. Cattelain. Ethnoarchaeological Perspectives: Hunting and Multifunctional Use of Bows and Arrows: Ethnoarchaeology of Technological Organization Among Pume Hunters of Venezuela
- R. Greaves. A Comparison of Kua (Botswana) and Hadza (Tanzania) Bow and Arrow Hunting
- L.E. Battram, Jr. Each According to Need and Fashion: Spear and Arrow Use Among Bushmen Hunters of the Kalahari
- R. Hitchcock, P. Bleed. Conclusion: Projectile Points: Form, Function, and Design
- M. Nelson. 2 Additional Chapters. Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より