Judgment calls : rhetoric, politics, and indeterminacy
著者
書誌事項
Judgment calls : rhetoric, politics, and indeterminacy
(Polemics series)
Westview Press, 1998
大学図書館所蔵 全3件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Recently, the concept of judgment has emerged as a highly contestatory site for philosophical, rhetorical, and cultural reflection and inquiry. Judgment Calls offers a variety of essays that explore the question of judgment in a postmodern age, seeking out the question of how, once solid ground is pulled out from underneath the position of the judge, one continues to tread judgment, to meet obligations while remaining afloat.The essays in this edited volume investigate judgment as a rhetorical problem to be discussed philosophically and examines the standards by which judgments are made and can be made in contemporary culture. The essays clarify the links between rhetoric and judgment as they are played out on public and meta-critical levels. The concept of judgment has occupied a place of special importance in the tradition of Western thought. In antiquity and especially in the Enlightenment, judgment served as the rubric under which Western thinkers struggled to come to terms with how the world of human concerns is constituted in thought and, perhaps more important, how humans call for timely and appropriate actions.
Recently, judgment has again emerged as a highly contestatory site for philosophical, rhetorical, and cultural reflection and inquiry.This book puts into contact a variety of responses to the question of judgment in a postmodern age, seeking out the question of how, once solid ground is pulled out from underneath the position of the judge, one continues to tread judgment, to meet obligations while remaining afloat.The essays in this edited volume investigate judgment as a rhetorical problem to be discussed philosophically and examines the standards by which judgments are made and can be made in contemporary culture. The essays clarify the links between rhetoric and judgment as they are played out on public and meta-critical levels.
目次
- Hopes Finitude: An Introduction
- (James P. McDaniel and John M. Sloop)
- Judgment And The Theoretical Quagmire
- Phronesis in the Gadamer Versus Habermas Debates
- (Michael Calvin McGee)
- Judgment and the Problem of Agency/Accountability: A Postcolonial Critique of Poststructuralist Theory
- (K. E. Supriya)
- Decentering Judgment: Toward a Postmodern Communication Ethic
- (Martha Cooper)
- Judgment and Jouissance: Eliot, Freud, and Lacan Read Hamlet
- (Susan Schwartz)
- More Than Meets the Eye: An Expos on Patriotic Libido and Judgment at the Level of the Image in American War Culture
- (James P. McDaniel)
- Case Studies In Treading Judgment
- Had Judas Been a Black Man: Politics, Race, and Gender in African America
- (Karen L. Dace)
- The Fictions of Racialized Identities
- (Marouf A. Hasian, Jr. and Thomas K. Nakayama) {/CHAP Judging Parents
- (Ronald Walter Greene and Darrin Hicks)
- Property and Propriety: Rhetoric, Justice, and Lyotards Diffrend
- (Maurice Charland)
- Afterward: Justifying, Positioning, Persuading in the Intermediate World
- (Robert Hariman)
「Nielsen BookData」 より