Three anarchical fallacies : an essay on political authority
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Three anarchical fallacies : an essay on political authority
(Cambridge studies in philosophy and law)
Cambridge University Press, 1998
- : pbk
Available at 18 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
How is a legitimate state possible? Obedience, coercion and intrusion are three ideas that seem inseparable from all government and seem to render state authority presumptively illegitimate. This book exposes three fallacies inspired by these ideas and in doing so challenges assumptions shared by liberals, libertarians, cultural conservatives, moderates and Marxists. In three clear and tightly argued essays William Edmundson dispels these fallacies and shows that living in a just state remains a worthy ideal. This is an important book for all philosophers, political scientists and legal theorists as well as other readers interested in the views of Rawls, Dworkin and Nozick, many of whose central ideas are subjected to rigorous critique.
Table of Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I. The Fallacious Argument from the Failure of Political Obligation: 1. Legitimacy and the duty to obey
- 2. The correlativity thesis
- 3. Legitimate political authority
- Part II. The 'Law is Coercive' Fallacy: 4. The concept of coercion
- 5. Political theory without coercion
- 6. Coercion Redivivus
- Part III. The Inner Sphere of Privacy Fallacy: 7. The private sphere
- 8. The moral and the social
- 9. The social and the political
- Conclusion: the state for what?
- Index.
by "Nielsen BookData"