European technology policy in Germany : the impact of European Community policies upon science and technology in Germany
著者
書誌事項
European technology policy in Germany : the impact of European Community policies upon science and technology in Germany
（Technology, innovation, and policy, 2）
Physica-Verlag, c1995
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全3件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [184]-187)
内容説明・目次
内容説明
1. 1 Purpose of the Study When the Agreement for the Foundation of the European Economic Community (EC Treaty) was extended and changed by the Single European Act (SEA), ratified by all the Member States of the European Community (EC) in July 1987, research and techno logical development were placed for the first time on an equal footing with other politi cal competences of the EC. In the newly added Articles 130 f - q of the EC Treaty the aims and policy measures are clearly formulated, thus giving the EC a real competence to act. The main aim of European research and technological development policy (RID policy) is (according to Article 130f of the SEA) to strengthen the scientific and technical basis of European industry and the development of its international competitiveness, to support transnational cooperation between industry and science, and to integrate the area of research and technological development into the general concept for the realisation of the internal market of the European Community. The main instruments of European RID policy are the "Community Framework Pro grammes", running for several years, in which the aims, priorities and fmancial dimen sions are defmed for a period of four to five years.
目次
1. Introduction.- 1.1 Purpose of the Study.- 1.2 Subject of the Study.- 1.3 Methods.- 1.4 Structure of the Study.- 2. The RTD Policy of Germany and the European Community.- 2.1 The German Research Landscape.- 2.2 RTD Policy of the European Community.- 2.3 Interfaces between German and Community Policy.- 2.3.1 Strategic Role of EC RTD Policy from the German Perspective.- 2.3.2 The Shaping and Influencing of Community Policy from the German Viewpoint.- 2.3.3 Interaction with the Adressees of EC RTD Policy.- 3. The Structure of German Participants in the Second Framework Programme.- 3.1 DataBase.- 3.2 Structure of Participants according to Types of Institutions.- 3.3 Structure according to Participants' Position in Project Consortium.- 3.4 Participation in Specific Programmes.- 3.5 Regional Distribution.- 3.6 Summary and Conclusions.- 4. Importance of EC RTD Policy and its Influence on Enterprises.- 4.1 Characteristics of Participants and Non-participants in the Survey.- 4.2 Description of Sample and Comparison with Basic Population.- 4.3 Importance and Strategic Significance for Participating Enterprises.- 4.3.1 Characterisation of EC Projects.- 4.3.2 Strategic Role of EC Projects.- 4.4 Reasons and Aims of Participation, Results and Success Factors.- 4.5 Impacts on Participating Enterprises.- 4.5.1 Economic, Strategic, Technical and Scientific Impacts.- 4.5.2 Impacts on the Cooperation Behaviour.- 4.5.3 Social and Environmentally Relevant Impacts.- 4.6 Importance of EC RTD Policy for Non-participating Enterprises.- 4.7 The Future Development of National and Community Policy.- 4.8 Summary and Conclusions.- 5. Importance of EC RTD Policy and its Influence on Institutes of Higher Education.- 5.1 Characteristics of Participants and Non-participants in the Survey.- 5.2 Description of Sample and Comparison with Basic Population.- 5.3 Importance and Strategic Role for Participating Institutes.- 5.3.1 Characterisation of EC Projects.- 5.3.2 Strategic Role of EC Projects.- 5.4 Reasons and Aims of Participation, Results and Success Factors.- 5.5 Impacts on Participating Institutes.- 5.5.1 Economic, Technical and Scientific Impacts.- 5.5.2 Impacts on the Cooperation Behaviour.- 5.5.3 Social and Environmentally Relevant Impacts.- 5.6 Significance of EC RTD Policy for Non-participating Institutes.- 5.7 Future Development of National and Community Policy.- 5.8 Summary and Conclusions.- 6. The Importance of EC RTD Policy and its Influence on Non-university R&D Institutes.- 6.1 Characteristics of Participants and Non-participants in the Survey.- 6.2 Importance and Strategic Significance for Participants.- 6.2.1 Characterisation of EC Projects.- 6.2.2 Strategic Role of EC Projects.- 6.3 Reasons and Aims for Participation, Results and Success Factors.- 6.4 Impacts on Participating R&D Institutes.- 6.4.1 Economic, Technical and Scientific Impacts.- 6.4.2 Impacts on the Cooperative Behaviour.- 6.4.3 Social and Environmentally Relevant Impacts.- 6.5 Importance of EC RTD Policy for Non-participating R&D Institutes.- 6.6 The Future Development of National and Community Policy.- 6.7 Summary and Conclusions.- 7. RTD Support and the New Lander.- 7.1 The Special Situation of Research Institutions in the New Lander.- 7.2 Empirical Basis of the Results.- 7.3 Indications from East German Participants.- 7.4 Characteristics of Non-participants in the New Lander.- 7.5 Future Importance of EC RTD Policy.- 7.6 Summary and Conclusions.- 8. Assessment and Conclusions: Impact of Community Policy for the German Research Landscape.- 8.1 Importance and Scope of Community Technology Policy.- 8.1.1 Importance for the German Research Landscape.- 8.1.2 Strategic Importance for Participants.- 8.2 Character and Aims of EC Projects.- 8.2.1 Character of EC Projects.- 8.2.2 Correspondence of Support Aims and Participants' Aims.- 8.3 Results and Impacts on German Actors.- 8.3.1 Improvement of the Scientific and Technical Basis.- 8.3.2 Impacts on Transnational Cooperations.- 8.3.3 Impacts on Strategies and Competitiveness.- 8.4 Impacts on Policy.- 9. Outlook.- References.- Annex: Tables and Figures.
「Nielsen BookData」 より