The new theory of reference : Kripke, Marcus, and its origins

書誌事項

The new theory of reference : Kripke, Marcus, and its origins

edited by Paul W. Humphreys and James H. Fetzer

Kluwer Academic Pub., 1999

この図書・雑誌をさがす
注記

First published 1998 in hardbound edition in the series Synthese library, vol. 270

Includes bibliographical references and indexes

内容説明・目次

内容説明

On January 20th, 22nd, and 29th, 1970 Saul Kripke delivered three lectures at Princeton University. They produced something of a sensation. In the lectures he argued, amongst other things, that many names in ordinary language referred to objects directly rather than by means of associated descriptions; that causal chains from language user to language user were an important mechanism for preserving reference; that there were necessary a posteriori and contingent a priori truths; that identity relations between rigid designators were necessary; and argued, more tentatively, that materialist identity theories in the philosophy of mind were suspect. Interspersed with this was a consider able amount of material on natural kind terms and essentialism. As a result of these lectures and a related 1971 paper, 'Identity and Necessity' (Kripke [1971]), talk of rigid designators, Hesperus and Phosphorus, meter bars, gold and H 0, and suchlike quickly became commonplace in philosophical circles 2 and when the lectures were published under the title Naming and Necessity in the collection The Semantics of Natural Language (Davidson and Harman l [1972]), that volume became the biggest seller in the Reidel (later Kluwer) list. The cluster of theses surrounding the idea that a relation of direct reference 2 exists between names and their referents is now frequently referred to as 'The 3 New Theory of Reference'.

目次

  • Introduction
  • P. Humphreys, J.H. Fetzer. Part I: The APA Exchange. Marcus, Kripke, and the Origin of the New Theory of Reference
  • Q. Smith. Revisionism about Reference: A Reply to Smith
  • S. Soames. Marcus and the New Theory of Reference: A Reply to Scott Soames
  • Q. Smith. Part II: Replies. More Revisionism About Reference
  • S. Soames. Marcus, Kripke, and Names
  • J.P. Burgess. How Not to Write History of Philosophy: A Case Study
  • J.P. Burgess. Direct, Rigid Designation and A Posteriori Necessity: A History and Critique
  • Q. Smith. Part III: Historical Origins. Referential Opacity and Modal Logic
  • D. Follesdal. An Exposition and Development of Kanger's Early Semantics for Modal Logic
  • S. Lindstroem. A More Comprehensive History of the New Theory of Reference
  • Q. Smith. Index of Names. Index of Subjects.

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報
ページトップへ