U.S. foreign policy in the twenty-first century : the relevance of realism
著者
書誌事項
U.S. foreign policy in the twenty-first century : the relevance of realism
(Political traditions in foreign policy series)
Louisiana State University Press, c1999
- : cloth : alk. paper
- タイトル別名
-
U.S. foreign policy in the 21st century
大学図書館所蔵 全12件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [157]-162) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In U.S. Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century, Robert J. Myers gives coherent and pointed statement to a complex history of political theory involving idealism and its theoretical counterpart, realism. He sets out to restate the possible outcomes of the tension between idealist and realist expectations ""so that there may be a broader consensus on what one can both expect and accept about how the political world works in normal times and in times of crisis.""
Adherents of realism like Myers claim that a political philosophy based on the key considerations of interest, power, and moral purpose will create order from the seemingly chaotic nature of international relations. This approach, known as political realism, calls for the intervention of a statesman-philosopher with a profound understanding of international political operations.
Early chapters on the legacy of the Peloponnesian War, on Machiavelli and human nature, on Kant and the ""institutionalization"" of peace, on China's international relations system, and on historicism and pro-gress lay the historical groundwork for understanding how the premises of political realism neither lead to pacifism in the face of challenge nor anticipate the elimination of war as an instrument of state power. Chapters on the ""just war,"" isolationism as a misapplication of international organisation, environmental
issues, and human rights follow, with a concluding chapter on what Myers calls the promise of realism for the United States.
Idealist solutions to problems of power (e.g., new institutions, a new world community to subsume differences) usually present new problems and no lasting results. As Myers demonstrates, only through the study of the ideas of ancient and modern political philosophers can one see the enduring outlines of good statecraft, based on the principles of political realism. The wise leaders of the future will follow the soundest principles of the past, taking the United States and the world confidently into the twenty-first century.
「Nielsen BookData」 より