Freedmen, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the right to bear arms, 1866-1876
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Freedmen, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the right to bear arms, 1866-1876
Praeger, c1998
Available at / 4 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [207]-214) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Whether newly-freed slaves could be trusted to own firearms was in great dispute in 1866, and the ramifications of this issue reverberate in today's gun-control debate. This is the only comprehensive study ever published on the intent of the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment and of Reconstruction-era civil rights legislation to protect the right to keep and bear arms. Indeed, this is the most detailed study ever published about the intent of the Fourteenth Amendment to incorporate and to protect from state violation any of the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, even including free speech. Paradoxically, the Second Amendment is virtually the only Bill of Rights guarantee not recognized by the federal courts as protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Through legislative and historical records generated during the Reconstruction epoch (1866-1876), Halbrook shows the intent of the Fourteenth Amendment and of civil rights legislation to guarantee full and equal rights to blacks, including the right to keep and bear arms.
Table of Contents
Preface
The Civil Rights and Freedmen's Bureau Acts and the Proposal of the Fourteenth Amendment
Congress Reacts to Southern Rejection of the Fourteenth Amendment
The Southern State Constitutional Conventions
The Freedmen's Bureau Act Reenacted and the Fourteenth Amendment Ratified
Toward Adoption of the Civil Rights Act of 1871
From the Klan Trials and Hearings through the End of the Civil Rights Revolution
The Cruikshank Case, from Trial to the Supreme Court
Unfinished Jurisprudence
by "Nielsen BookData"