Comparative QSAR
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Comparative QSAR
Taylor & Francis, c1998
- alk. paper
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
As the 21st century approaches, there is little doubt that the tools and resources are available to unlock all the secrets of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) in order to design more efficient drugs and safer chemicals. The comparison QSAR models provide are a key to reach a deep understanding of the foundation and a better optimisation of the use of these statistical tools. Seeking out the similarities and differences among QSAR Models allows the user to estimate their simulation performances, find chemo-taxonomical links, and uncover In vivo/In Vitro relationships.
The purpose of this book is to highlight the multifaceted aspect of the term "comparative QSAR" by bringing together QSAR experts of various origins and allowing them to offer their views on this diverse subject.
Table of Contents
1. Comparison for Fish Bioconcentration Models J. Devillers, D. Domine, S Bintein and W. Karcher 2. QSARs in Aquatic Toxicology - a Mechanism of Action Approach Comparing Toxic Potency to Pimephales promelas, Tetrahymena pyriformis and Vibrio fischeri T.W. Schultz, G.D. Sinks and A.P. Bearden 3. Comparative QSAR and 3D-QSAR Analysis of the Mutagenicity of Nitroaromatic Compounds R.L. Compadre, C. Byrd and C.M. Compadre 4. Some Novel Approaches to Modelling Transdermal Penetration and Reactivity with epidermal proteins P.S. Magee 5. Contribution of Structure-Odour Relationships to the Elucidation of the Origin of Musk Fragrance Activity D. Zakarya and M. Chastrette 6. QSAR Analysis of Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase Inhibitors K.N. Reddy, F.E. Dayan and S.O. Duke 7. Comparative QSAR of the Inhibition of Dihydrofolate Reductase C.D. Selassie and T.E. Klein 8. A Generalised Approach to Comparative QSAR C. Hansch, H. Gao and D. Hoekman. Bintein, Ministry of the Environment, France, C. Byrd, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA, M. Chastrette, University of Lyon, France, C.M. Compadre, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA, R.L. Compadre, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA, F.E. Dayan, University of Mississippi, USA, J. Devillers, CTIS, France, D. Domine, CTIS, France, S.O. Duke, University of Mississippi, USA, H. Gao, Pomana College, USA, C. Hansch, Pomana College, USA, D. Hoekman, Pomana College, USA, W. Karcher, Ispra Establishment, Italy, T.E. Klein, University of California, USA, P.S. Magee, UCSF School of Medicine, USA, K.N. Reddy, Southern Weed Science Laboratory, USA, T.W. Schultz, University of Tennessee, USA, C.D. Selassie, Pomana College, USA, G.D. Sinks, University of Tennessee, USA, D. Zakarya, Faculty of Science and Technology, Morocco.
by "Nielsen BookData"