Bibliographic Information

Form and argument in late Plato

edited by Christopher Gill and Mary Margaret McCabe

Clarendon Press , Oxford University Press, 2000

  • : pbk

Available at  / 11 libraries

Search this Book/Journal

Note

Bibliography: p. [313]-323

Includes indexes

Description and Table of Contents

Description

Why did Plato put his philosophical arguments into dialogues, rather than presenting them in a plain and readily understandable fashion? In writing rich tales of philosophical encounters, does Plato desert clarity in favour of seducing his readers with fine words, or is there a philosophical reason behind the form of his argument? While recent work has focused on the literary brilliance of the early dialogues, the late dialogues present a particular problem: they lack the vivid literary character of Plato's earlier works, and the dialogue structure seems to be a mere formality. Is there a philosophical reason why Plato's late works are in the form of dialogues? In this volume, a group of internationally prominent scholars address that question. Their answers are fresh, varied, and powerfully argued. This volume offers both a series of first-class essays on major late Platonic dialogues and a discussion which has important implications for the study of philosophical method and the relation between philosophy and literature. It shows that the literary form and modes of dialectic of the late dialogues are richly rewarding to study, and that doing so is of deep importance for Plato's philosophical project.

by "Nielsen BookData"

Details

  • NCID
    BA49494816
  • ISBN
    • 0199241422
  • LCCN
    00044596
  • Country Code
    uk
  • Title Language Code
    eng
  • Text Language Code
    eng
  • Place of Publication
    Oxford,New York
  • Pages/Volumes
    x, 345 p.
  • Size
    23 cm
  • Classification
  • Subject Headings
Page Top