D.H. Lawrence : fifty years on film
著者
書誌事項
D.H. Lawrence : fifty years on film
Southern Illinois University Press, c2001
大学図書館所蔵 全25件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes filmography (p. 227-228) and videography (p. 229-230)
Includes bibliographical references (p. 257-267) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Between 1949 and 1999, the life and works of D.H. Lawrence have inspired ten feature films: nine based on works of fiction and one based on biography. In "D.H. Lawrence: Fifty Years on Film", Louis K. Grieff examines these films as adaptations, as cultural or historical documents, and as independent works of art. Significantly, the films were not spread evenly throughout decades but appeared in three clusters. The first group, or the "black and white", appeared between 1949 and 1960. With the exception of Marc Allegret's "L'Amant de Lady Chatterley" (1955), all celebrate the British common man as a mid-century hero and promote an unmistakable yet never strident postwar ethos that is Marxism in spirit. The second cluster occurred during the late 1960s and early 1970s. These films show Lawrence's values as similar to the cultural values of the time - non-conformity, neobohemianism, sexual rebellion, war protest, and the celebration of youth. The third group answers the question - why, in an un-Lawrentian decade like the 1980s, was there a revival of Lawrence's works on film?
Grieff also deals with the contributions made by directors Ken Russell and Christopher Miles, both of whom directed Lawrence films of the latter two clusters. He shows how Russell and, to a lesser extent, Miles were responsible for bringing mass audiences in touch with the works of Lawrence. Grieff's final and most important goal is to interpret and evaluate the Lawrence films. He looks first at the film as a visual representation of its text, then as an original act of creation and object of art.
「Nielsen BookData」 より