Understanding the process of economic change
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Understanding the process of economic change
(Occasional paper / Institute of Economic Affairs (Great Britain), 106)
Institute of Economic Affairs for the Wincott Foundation, 1999
Available at 3 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
"Twenty-eighth Wincott memorial lecture delivered at Bishop Partridge Hall, Church House, Westminster, on Monday, 12 October 1998"
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Static economic theories cannot explain a world of dynamic economic change As people have gained control over the physical environment, uncertainties resulting from human interaction have increased. The dominant beliefs of policy-makers result in'...the accretion of an elaborate structure of institutions, both formal rules and informal norms, that together determine economic and political performance.'(p.11) Beliefs, which determine the institutional structure, lead to policies. But these policies alter perceived reality, leading to feedback changes in beliefs, in institutions and in policies. '...the culture of a society is a cumulative structure of rules, norms and beliefs, that we inherit from the past, that shape our present and that influence our future.' (p.15) Most economists believe models derived from the past can help find the right polices for the future. But if reality is constantly being changed by policy, novel situations may be created with which we cannot easily deal. Western Europe and the United States have adapted their institutions so as to maintain continuous long term growth.
But this adaptive efficiency cannot readily be created in the short run in other societies. Economic history is a '...depressing tale of miscalculation' (p.18): We do not understand reality, our belief systems are imperfect and the control tools are '...very blunt instruments.' The ability to make radical change in a society depends on the way its beliefs have evolved and the degree to which those beliefs are amenable to change. 'Any market that is going to work well is structured by deliberate efforts to make the players compete by price and quality rather than...by killing each other or other means.' (p.23) But we do not know how to create the necessary political institutions.
by "Nielsen BookData"