How a film theory got lost and other mysteries in cultural studies
著者
書誌事項
How a film theory got lost and other mysteries in cultural studies
Indiana University Press, c2001
- : cl
- : pa
大学図書館所蔵 全9件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
- 巻冊次
-
: pa ISBN 9780253214386
内容説明
How a Film Theory Got Lost and Other Mysteries in Cultural Studies
Robert B. Ray
Foreword by James Naremore
Challenges accepted ideas about film and cultural studies.
In the 1920s, when film criticism was as new as the cinema itself, a particular way of thinking about the movies developed in Paris. The cinema, this theory suggested, turns on photography's automatism, the revolutionary fact that for the first time in human history a perfect representation of the world can be produced by accident. Moreover, the camera's gaze has the potential to transform ordinary objects-a telephone, a letter on a desk, a woman's face-into spellbinding images, swarming with details whose precise appeal remains unpredictable. By the 1930s, this theory of photogenie (photogenia) had vanished from most serious writing about film. Why did this disappearance occur? In this collection of essays, Robert B. Ray discusses this disappearance and other mysteries like it: Why did photography and the detective story originate at exactly the same time? Why has some of the most prominent academic writing about the cinema resisted anything but "scientific" accounts of the movies? What counts as "knowledge" in film studies or any intellectual discipline? What do the French Impressionists have in common with the Sex Pistols? How did Douglas Sirk's critically ignored melodramas become "subversive critiques of bourgeois ideology"? How did the fate of Sirk's movies help us understand postmodernism and the avant-garde? In taking up these questions, Ray's essays challenge certain ideas about film and cultural studies, while arguing for a mode of writing about the movies and experimental art that would respect the abidingly mysterious effect of their images and sounds.
Robert B. Ray, Director of Film and Media Studies and Professor of English at the University of Florida, is author of A Certain Tendency of the Hollywood Cinema 1930-1980 and The Avant-Garde Finds Andy Hardy. He is also a member of The Vulgar Boatmen, whose records include You and Your Sister, Please Panic, and Opposite Sex.
Contents
Foreword by James Naremore
Impressionism, Surrealism, and Film Theory: Path Dependence, or How a Tradition in Film Theory Gets Lost
The Bordwell Regime and the Stakes of Knowledge
Snapshots: The Beginnings of Photography
Tracking
How to Start and Avant-Garde
How to Teach Cultural Studies
The Best Way to Understand Postmodernism
The Mystery of Edward Hopper
Film and Literature
Conclusion
目次
Contents
Foreword by James Naremore
1. Impressionism, Surrealism, and Film Theory: Path Dependence, or How a Tradition in Film Theory Gets Lost
2. The Bordwell Regime and the Stakes of Knowledge
3. Snapshots: The Beginnings of Photography
4. Tracking
5. How to Start and Avant-Garde
6. How to Teach Cultural Studies
7. The Best Way to Understand Postmodernism
8. The Mystery of Edward Hopper
9. Film and Literature
Conclusion
Notes
Index
- 巻冊次
-
: cl ISBN 9780253338518
内容説明
In the 1920s, when film criticism was as new as the cinema itself, a particular way of thinking about the movies developed in Paris. The cinema, this theory suggested, turns on photography's automatism, the revolutionary fact that for the first time in human history, a perfect representation of the world can be produced by accident. Moreover, the camera's gaze has the potential to transform everyday life's most ordinary objects - a telephone, a letter on a desk, a woman's face - into spellbinding images, swarming with details whose precise appeal remains unpredictable. By the 1930s, this theory of photogenie (photogenia) had vanished from most serious writing about film. Why did this disappearance occur?In his collection of essays, Robert B. Ray discusses this mystery and others like it: why did photography and the detective story originate at exactly the same time? Why has some of the most prominent academic writing about the cinema resisted anything but 'scientific' accounts of the movies? What counts as 'knowledge' in film studies or any intellectual discipline? What do the French Impressionists have in common with the "Sex Pistols"?
How did Douglas Sirk's critically ignored melodramas become 'subversive critiques of bourgeois ideology'? How is what happened to Sirk's movies a way to understand Postmodernism and the avant-garde? In taking up these questions, Ray's essays challenge certain ideas about film and cultural studies, while arguing for a mode of writing about the movies and experimental art that would respect the abidingly mysterious effect of their images and sounds.
目次
Contents: Foreword by James Naremore 1. Impressionism, Surrealism, and Film Theory: Path Dependence, or How a Tradition in Film Theory Gets Lost 2. The Bordwell Regime and the Stakes of Knowledge 3. Snapshots: The Beginnings of Photography 4. Tracking 5. How to Start and Avant-Garde 6. How to Teach Cultural Studies 7. The Best Way to Understand Postmodernism 8. The Mystery of Edward Hopper 9. Film and Literature Conclusion Notes Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より