Landmark essays on classical Greek rethoric
著者
書誌事項
Landmark essays on classical Greek rethoric
(Landmark essays series, v. 3)
Hermagoras Press, 1994
- タイトル別名
-
Landmark essays, classical Greek rethoric
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 243-248) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This volume's purpose is to provide students and scholars of classical rhetoric with a set of exemplary works in the area of Greek rhetorical theory. Many of the articles included here are not easily accessible and have been selected with the intent of providing graduate and undergraduate students with a useful collection of secondary source materials. This book is also envisioned as a useful text for scholars who will benefit from having these sources more readily available.
Scholarship in classical Greek rhetorical theory typically is aimed at one of these two goals:
* Historical reconstruction is work that attempts to understand the contributions of past theorists or practitioners. Scholars involved in the historical reconstruction of Greek rhetorical theories attempt to understand the cultural context in which these theories originally appear.
* Contemporary appropriation is work that attempts to utilize the insights of past theorists or practitioners in order to inform current theory or criticism. Rather than describe rhetorical theory as it evolved through the contingencies of the past, scholars who attempt the contemporary appropriation of classical texts do so in order to shed insight on rhetorical concerns as they are manifested in today's environment.
As can be seen in the following articles, historical reconstruction and contemporary appropriation differ in terms of goals and methods. Because the goal of historical reconstruction is to capture the past -- insofar as possible -- on its own terms, the methods of the historian and, in classical work, the philologist, are appropriate. As a result, many of the papers draw heavily on the original Greek terminology to describe a given theorist's contributions. All Greek words have been transliterated in this edition in order to improve readability. In addition, the meanings of Greek words which are not explicitly discussed include a bracketed translation to make the text more accessible for non-Greek reading audiences.
目次
Contents: E. Schiappa, O. Swartz, Introduction. Section 1:Earliest Greek Rhetoric.J.T. Kirby, The "Great Triangle" in Early Greek Rhetoric and Poetics (1990). K.E. Wilkerson, From Hero to Citizen: Persuasion in Early Greece (1982). A.J. Karp, Homeric Origins of Ancient Rhetoric (1977). Section II:Sophistic Rhetorical Theory.J. Poulakos, Toward a Sophistic Definition of Rhetoric (1983). E. Schiappa, Sophistic Rhetoric: Oasis or Mirage? (1991). Section III:Platonic Rhetorical Theory.E. Black, Plato's View of Rhetoric (1958) C. Kauffman, The Axiological Foundations of Plato's Theory of Rhetoric (1982). Section IV:Isocratean Rhetoric.W. Jaeger, The Rhetoric of Isocrates and Its Cultural Ideal (1943). E. Rummel, Isocrates' Ideal of Rhetoric: Criteria of Evaluation (1979). Section V:Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory.C. Lord, The Intention of Aristotle's 'Rhetoric' (1981). J.H. McBurney, The Place of the Enthymeme in Rhetorical Theory (1936). R.C. Huseman, Aristotle's System of Topics (1965). Section 6:Post-Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory.G.A. Kennedy, Theophrastus (1963). O.A.L. Dieter, Stasis (1950).
「Nielsen BookData」 より