Categorical principles of law : a counterpoint to modernity
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Categorical principles of law : a counterpoint to modernity
Pennsylvania State University Press, c2002
- : pbk
- : cloth
- Other Title
-
Kategorische Rechtsprinzipien : ein Kontrapunkt der Moderne
Available at 7 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Originally published: Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp , c1990
Includes bibliography (p. 289-296) and index
"This translation also incorporates the article 'Eine Konversion der kritischen Theorie'(Habermas), in Vernunft und Recht : Bausteine zu einem interkulturellen Rechtsdiskurs, pp. 146-59"--T.p. verso
Description and Table of Contents
Description
In Germany, Otfried Hoeffe has been a leading contributor to debates in moral, legal, political, and social philosophy for close to three decades. Hoeffe's work (like that of his contemporary, Jurgen Habermas), brings into relief the relevance of these German discussions to their counterparts in English-language circles.
In this book, originally published in Germany in 1990 and expanded since, Hoeffe proposes an extended and original interpretation of Kant' philosophy of law, and social morality. Hoeffe articulates his reading of Kant in the context of an account of modernity as a "polyphonous project," in which the dominant themes of pluralism and empiricism are countered by the theme of categorically binding moral principles, such as human rights. Paying equal attention to the nuances of Kant's texts and the character of the philosophical issues in their own right, Hoeffe ends up with a Kantianism that requires, rather than precludes, a moral anthropology and that questions the fashionable juxtaposition of Kant and Aristotle as exemplars of incompatible approaches to ethical and political thought.
by "Nielsen BookData"