Accountability of armed opposition groups in international law
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Accountability of armed opposition groups in international law
(Cambridge studies in international and comparative law)
Cambridge University Press, 2002
- : pbk
Available at 24 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 231-241) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Who is accountable under international law for the acts committed by armed opposition groups? In today's world the majority of political conflicts involve non-state actors attempting to exert political influence (such as overthrowing a government or bringing about secession). Notwithstanding their impact on the course of events, however, we often know little about these groups, and even less about how to treat their actions legally. In this award-winning scholarship, Liesbeth Zegveld examines the need to legally identify the parties involved when internal conflicts arise, and the reality of their demands for rights. Her study draws upon international humanitarian law, human rights law and international criminal law to consider a fundamental question: who is accountable for the acts committed by non-state actors, or for the failure to prevent or repress these acts? This study will be of interest to academics, postgraduate students and professionals involved with armed conflict and international relations.
Table of Contents
- Table of treaties and declarations
- Table of cases
- Table of other documents
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I. The Normative Gap: 1. Legal restraints on armed opposition groups as such
- 2. Substantive obligations of armed opposition groups as such
- Part II. The Accountability Gap: 3. Accountability of group leaders
- 4. Accountability of armed opposition groups as such
- 5. Accountability of the state for acts of armed opposition groups
- 6. The quest for accountability
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index.
by "Nielsen BookData"