Religion, toleration, and British writing, 1790-1830
著者
書誌事項
Religion, toleration, and British writing, 1790-1830
(Cambridge studies in romanticism, 53)
Cambridge University Press, 2002
大学図書館所蔵 全33件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 302-313) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In Religion, Toleration, and British Writing, 1790-1830, Mark Canuel examines the way that Romantic poets, novelists and political writers criticized the traditional grounding of British political unity in religious conformity. Canuel shows how a wide range of writers including Jeremy Bentham, Ann Radcliffe, Maria Edgeworth and Lord Byron not only undermined the validity of religion in the British state, but also imagined a new, tolerant and more organized mode of social inclusion. To argue against the authority of religion, Canuel claims, was to argue for a thoroughly revised form of tolerant yet highly organized government, in other words, a mode of political authority that provided unprecedented levels of inclusion and protection. Canuel argues that these writers saw their works as political and literary commentaries on the extent and limits of religious toleration. His study throws light on political history as well as the literature of the Romantic period.
目次
- Acknowledgments
- Preface
- 1. Romanticism and the writing of toleration
- 2. 'Holy hypocrisy' and the rule of belief: Radcliffe's gothics
- 3. Coleridge's polemic divinity
- 4. Sect and secular economy in the Irish national tale
- 5. Wordsworth and 'the frame of social being'
- 6. 'Consecrated fancy': Byron and Keats
- 7. Conclusion: the inquisitorial stage
- Selected bibliography
- Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より