The linguistics of political argument : the spin-doctor and the wolf-pack at the White House
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
The linguistics of political argument : the spin-doctor and the wolf-pack at the White House
(Routledge advances in corpus linguistics / edited by Anthony McEnery and Michael Hoey, 4)
Routledge, 2003
Available at 12 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [268]-275) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This book examines the relationship between the White House, in the person of its press secretary, and the press corps through a linguistic analysis of the language used by both sides. A corpus was compiled of around fifty press briefings from the late Clinton years. A wide range of topics are discussed from the Kosovo crisis to the Clinton-Lewinsky affair.
This work is highly original in demonstrating how concordance technology and the detailed linguistic evidence available in corpora can be used to study discourse features of text and the communicative strategies of speakers. It will be of vital interest to all linguists interested in corpus-based linguistics and pragmatics, as well as sociolinguists and students and scholars of communications, politics and the media.
Table of Contents
Foreword: The spin-doctor and the wolf-pack
Introduction: Corpora, discourse, politics and the press
1. Briefings as a type of discourse
2. Footing: Who says what to whom
3. Voices of the press
4. Voices of the podium
5. Footing shift for attribution: 'According to the New York Times this morning'
6. 'Rules of Engagement': The interpersonal relationship between the podium and the press
7. Politics, power and politeness
8. Conflict talk
9. The form of words
10. Metaphors of the world
11. Rhetoric, bluster and on-line gaffes
12. Evasion and pursuit
13. General Conclusions
by "Nielsen BookData"