Equal treatment for people with mental retardation : having and raising children
著者
書誌事項
Equal treatment for people with mental retardation : having and raising children
Harvard University Press, 2001
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全2件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 401-424) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Engaging in sex, becoming parents, raising children: these are among the most personal decisions we make, and for people with mental retardation, these decisions are consistently challenged, regulated, and outlawed. This book is a comprehensive study of the American legal doctrines and social policies, past and present, that have governed procreation and parenting by persons with mental retardation. It argues persuasively that people with retardation should have legal authority to make their own decisions.
Despite the progress of the normalization movement, which has moved so many people with mental retardation into the mainstream since the 1960s, negative myths about reproduction and child rearing among this population persist. Martha Field and Valerie Sanchez trace these prejudices to the eugenics movement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. They show how misperceptions have led to inconsistent and discriminatory outcomes when third parties seek to make birth control or parenting decisions for people with mental retardation. They also explore the effect of these decisions on those they purport to protect. Detailed, thorough, and just, their book is a sustained argument for reform of the legal practices and social policies it describes.
目次
Preface Acknowledgments PART I: INTRODUCTION Some Families Public Policy, Past and Present Changing Policies toward Mental Retardation The Current Policy Dilemma concerning Parents with Retardation Who Are Called "Retarded"? Causes of Mental Retardation Defining and Classifying Mental Retardation A History of Intelligence Testing Evolving Definitions of IQ IQ Testing Today PART II: PROCREATION Procreative Choice--But Whose? Different Legal Approaches Discrimination against Persons Who Have Retardation The Patient as the Appropriate Decisionmaker Benefits and Costs of Protective Measures Resolving the Problem Evolution of Policies toward Sterilization Procedural Protections The Need for Substantive Reforms Judicial Decisionmaking in a Legislative Void Ambivalence toward Eugenics Current Policy Issues concerning Sterilization Strict Prohibition of Nonconsensual Sterilization Retreat from Strict Prohibition Judicial Supervision of Third-Party Consent to Sterilization What Should the Standards for Sterilization Be? Substituted Judgment or Best Interests? Standards for Who Can Be Sterilized and When Disagreement about the Reasons for Sterilization Sex and Contraception Constitutional Law concerning Minors' Access to Sex Constitutional Law concerning Adults' Access to Sex Access to Sex for Persons with Retardation The Importance of Sex Education Preferring Contraception over Sterilization Contraception: Practice and Law Different Legal Treatment of Sterilization and Other Contraceptive Measures Distinguishing Sterilization from Other Contraception The Legal Status of Persons with Mental Retardation Conpared with that of Children The Limited Impact of Guardianship Four Scenarios Imprecise Rules about When Guardianship Is Appropriate Interactions between Guardian and Ward The Peculiar Problem of Abortion Two Differing Legal Approaches Does Practice Accord with the Law? Standards for Abortion Resistance from the Patient PART III: A PROPOSAL FOR SELF-DETERMINATION Self-Determination Explained and Evaluated The Necessity for Self-Determination Respecting a Patient's Resistance Four Scenarios Critique: Danger and Unworkability How the Proposed System Would Work The Best Available Solution Necessary Limitations on Self-Determination Nonexpressive Persons Minors The Possibility of Varying the Rule The Glen Ridge Rape Case Should Sterilization Be Available Only with Actual Informed Consent? PART IV: PARENTING Some Underlying Rules and Issues Standards for Evaluating Parents: Adoption, Neglect and Abuse, and Custody Proceedings Comparing the Standards The Difficulty and Subjectivity of Defining Unfitness Use and Misuse of Sociological Studies Written Law concerning Parenting: Important Issues for Parents with Retardation Historical Perspective: Per se Disqualification The Unconstitutionality of Disqualifying Parents Because of Unfitness of Their Group Evolution of the Standard Toward an Appropriate Legal Standard, Applicable to All Parents The Social Welfare System in Practice The Process for Parents in General Applying the Procedures to Parents Who Have Retardation Reforming the System Some Difficult Policy Issues Applying Procedural Protections to Removal Proceedings Adjusting the Interval between Removal and Termination More Flexible Kinds of Adoption Providing Assistance Devising Solutions Hope for the Future Some Key Suggested Reforms Conclusion Notes Bibliography Cases Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より