Determining damages : the psychology of jury awards
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Determining damages : the psychology of jury awards
(The law and public policy)
American Psychological Association, c2003
Available at 8 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 207-226) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Determining Damages examines whether jurors are able to assess damages in a fair and predictable manner. Jury decisions about damages have been deemed biased, capricious, unreliable, hostile to corporate defendants, excessively generous, and out of control. In this book, the authors provide an empirical analysis of the ways that jurors and juries determine damage awards. A theme that pervades the book is that in many respects, jurors charged with the complex task of compensating the injured and punishing the wrongdoers do a commendable job of it. When jury decisions diverge from what we expect, the difficulty of the decision-making context may be at least as much to blame as any moral or intellectual failings on the individual jurors. The authors discuss the factors that influence damage assessment, such as the identity of the plaintiff, defendant and jurors themselves; the severity and nature of the injury; and the conduct of the litigants. They also examine the different reasoning processes that jurors use to determine what they believe are just awards. The book culminates with a discussion that considers whether or not the American jury system should be reformed.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Characterizing Jury Damage Awards
- The Issue of Identity: How Plaintiffs', Defendants', and Jurors' Characteristics Influence Damage Award Decisions
- Who is the Plaintiff?
- Who is the Defendant?
- Who are the Jurors?
- The Evidence: How Injury Severity and Litigants' Conduct Influence Damage Award Decisions
- The Severity and Nature of the Injury
- The Litigants' Conduct
- Decision Processes and Reforms: How Jurors Reason About Damages and how Damage Award Decisions Might be Improved
- How Jurors Reason About Damages
- Reforming Damage Award Decision Making
- Final Remarks and Recommendations
by "Nielsen BookData"