Equality and non-discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights
著者
書誌事項
Equality and non-discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights
(International studies in human rights, v. 74)
M. Nijhoff, c2003
大学図書館所蔵 全16件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Revised and updated version of author's thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Edinburgh, 2001
Includes bibliographical references (p. [251]-261) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The case-law of the European Court of Human Rights on discrimination under the Convention is typically considered to be unclear and conflicting. Against that background, new possibilities for more effective protection against discrimination are opening up through recent developments in the case-law on Article 14 and with the advent of the new Protocol 12 to the Convention. This study demonstrates that the 'objective and reasonable justification' test and convenional treatment of non-discrimination are not apt for dealing with these emerging new possibilities or for explaining the variations in existing case-law. It therefore suggests a new approach to dealing with protection against discrimination under the Convention, developed by focusing on variations in the strictness of objective justification review. This study proposes a more viable framework for understanding discrimination analysis under the Convention which includes an alternative interpretation of the burden of proof under Article 14 and a three-tiered model of factors that influences the strictness of review.
目次
1. Introduction. 2. Substantive Equality. 3. Protection against Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights. 4. Strictness of Review and the Burden of Proof. 5. Strictness of Review and the Influencing Factors. 6. Strictness of Review and the Necessity of Review. 7. Conclusions. Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4. Judgments Referred to in the Study. Bibliography. Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より