Calculating the value of the Union : slavery, property rights, and the economic origins of the Civil War
著者
書誌事項
Calculating the value of the Union : slavery, property rights, and the economic origins of the Civil War
（Civil War America）
University of North Carolina Press, c2003
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全12件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 345-385) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
While slavery is often at the heart of debates over the causes of the Civil War, historians are not agreed on precisely what aspect of slavery--with its various social, economic, political, cultural, and moral ramifications--gave rise to the sectional rift. In Calculating the Value of the Union , James Huston integrates economic, social, and political history to argue that the issue of property rights as it pertained to slavery was at the center of the Civil War. In the early years of the nineteenth century, southern slaveholders sought a national definition of property rights that would recognize and protect their ownership of slaves. Northern interests, on the other hand, opposed any national interpretation of property rights because of the threat slavery posed to the northern free labor market, particularly if allowed to spread to western territories. This impasse sparked a process of political realignment that culminated in the creation of the Republican Party, ultimately leading to the secession crisis. Deeply researched and carefully written, this study rebuts recent trends in antebellum historiography and persuasively argues for a fundamentally economic interpretation of the slavery issue and the coming of the Civil War. |Huston argues that the dispute over the issue of property rights as it related to slavery was the fundamental cause of the Civil War. The North opposed slave ownership because it created an unfair labor market that put economic pressure on their region; the South maintained that freeing slaves without compensating the owners threatened its economic foundations. Huston shows how these economic differences fed directly into political realignment and sectionalism.
「Nielsen BookData」 より
