Autonomy, freedom and rights : a critique of liberal subjectivity
著者
書誌事項
Autonomy, freedom and rights : a critique of liberal subjectivity
(Law and philosophy library, v. 65)
Kluwer Academic, c2003
- タイトル別名
-
Autonomia individuale, libertà e diritti
大学図書館所蔵 全7件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 266-288) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
For the author freedom is not a fixed measure. It is not the container of powers and rights defining an individual's role and identity. It is rather the outcome of a process whereby individuals continuously re-define the shape of their individuality. Freedom is everything that each of us manages to be in his or her active and uncertain opposition to external 'pressures'.
目次
Introduction
1. Individual Autonomy and Freedom
1.1. Problem: Contemporary Liberal Theory and Subjectivity
1.1.1. The Elision of the Subject: Neo-positivism and the Dominance of Political Science
1.1.2. The Emerging of Subjectivity as the Foundation of Rights: Neo-positivism and Utilitarianism versus Neo-contractarianism
1.2. Individual Autonomy: A Conceptual Chimera?
1.2.1. Kant's Notion of Autonomy
1.2.2. Autonomy as Substantive Independence: Problems with the Facts-Values Division
1.2.3. The theory of 'moral muscle' and Millian personality
1.3. Individual Autonomy and Freedom: Positive versus Negative Freedom
1.3.1. 'False Consciousness' and the Problem of Manipulation 'Real Interests', Ideal Choice and Weak Paternalism
1.3.2. External Constraints, Internal Constraints and the Anthropological Model
1.3.3. Negative and Positive Freedom: The Issue of the Anthropological Model
-Republican Freedom according to Quentin Skinner n
-The 'Hierarchical-Dualist' Anthropological Model
-Freedom, Autonomy and Consent
2. A Genealogical Approach
2.1. The Hierarchical-dualist Model and the Genealogy of the Liberal Subject
2.2. The Annihilation of Worldly Identity: Scholasticism and the Medieval Order
2.2.1. The Individual as a Prisoner of the Group: The Lack of Political Subjectivity
2.22. The Individual as a Prisoner of Things
2.3. Franciscan Theology: Voluntarism and Dominium Sui
2.3.1. Nominalism and the Contingency of the World
2.3.2. The Dominant Individual: Dominium Sui as a Constituent of Subjectivity
2.4. Modernity and the Emergence of the Individual without Individuality
2.4.1 Classical Episteme: 'Man' and 'Representation' in Michel Foucault's Analysis
-The Cogito between 'Representation' and Reflexivity
-'Representation' and Self-assertion
2.4.2. The 'Representation' of the Individualas 'Owner'
-The Owning Individual and the Liberal Order
2.5. Liberalism's Broken Promises
2.5.1. The Liberal-Democratic Identity: Constitutive Problems
2.5.2. The Consent Theory of Political Obligation: Individual Autonomy as the Foundation of Liberal Order
2.5.3. The Theory of Political Obligation in English Contractarianism
2.5.4. The Central Place of the Hierarchical-dualist Model
-A Contrario Proof of the Central Place of the Hierarchical-dualist Model: Hume and Rousseau
2.5.5. The Contract Theory of the Neutralisation of Individuality: Locke versus Hobbes
-Reason and the Will in Hobbes and Locke
-Autonomy and Freedom in English Contractarianism
-The Metaphor of the State of Nature and Self-condemnation to Atomism
2.6. The Invisible Panopticon: The Naturalisation of Lockean Anthropology
3. Neo-Contractarianism and the Double Order of Desires
3.1. Henry Frankfurt and the Double Order of Desires
3.1.1. Double Order of Desires and Freedom
3.1.2. Limitations and Ambiguities of the Double Order of Desires
-Autonomy and Self-Evaluation
-Autonomy versus authenticity and coherence
-Theory and Practice of Autonomy
3.1.3. Critical Reflection and Grounding Decision
3.1.4. A New Version of Millian Personality
3.2. The Reflective Construction of Identity as the Hinge of Contemporary Liberal Democratic Theory
3.2.1. The Importance of Being 'Autonomous'
3.3. Individual Autonomy and the Theory of Justice: The Views of John Rawls
3.3.1. Autonomy and Political Order in Rawls's Earlier Thought
-Interests, Freedom, and Rights
-Autonomy and Objectivity
3.3.2. The Later Rawls: The Priority of Reasonableness over Individuality
-Autonomy versus Individuality
-Liberalism as Civil Religion
-The Limits of Rawls's Constructivism: the Grounding Role of the Normative Model of Personality
-The Notion of Autonomy and Rawls's
「Nielsen BookData」 より