The effective prosecution of multiple offending : report on a reference under section 3(1)(e) of the law commissions act 1965
著者
書誌事項
The effective prosecution of multiple offending : report on a reference under section 3(1)(e) of the law commissions act 1965
(Law Com., no. 277)
TSO, 2002
大学図書館所蔵 全2件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
"Presented to the Parliament of the United Kingdom by the Lord High Chancellor by Command of Her Majesty, October 2002"
"Cm5609"
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This report makes recommendations for changes to criminal practice and procedure which should facilitate the more effective prosecution of those who have committed multiple offences. The problems arise in cases where the offending conduct of the defendant is repeated many times - too many individual offences to be accommodated in a single trial. Formerly, such offending was dealt with by way of indictment charging offences which were regarded as specimens of a wider range of offending. Lord Bingham adjudicated in the Kidd & ors Court of Appeal case that a fundamental principle of sentencing was undermined if not all the offences were taken into account along with the specimen offences, and therefore the full criminality of a defendant's action was not being seen. However, remedying this poses a number of problems in terms of practicality and time, where there are limits on how many single offences can be managed within a jury trial.
It is seen that the present system cannot fully accommodate two fundamental principles: that defendants should only be sentenced for that which they have admitted or have been proved through trial, and, examined on the evidence; it should be possible to sentence for the totality of an individual's offending.
「Nielsen BookData」 より