Complexity in new product development : mastering the dynamics of engineering projects
著者
書誌事項
Complexity in new product development : mastering the dynamics of engineering projects
(Gabler Edition Wissenschaft)
Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, 2003
1. Aufl
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--Wissenschaftliche Hochschule für Unternehmensführung(WHU) Vallendar, 2002
Includes bibliographical references (p. 115-129)
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Jurgen Mihm builds a mathematical model of a complex distributed design project demonstrating how complexity inevitably arises from the interaction of simple components. He characterizes the dynamic behavior of the system analytically and with the aid of simulations, and he derives classes of managerial actions to improve performance dynamics.
目次
1 Introduction.- 2 Literature Review.- 2.1 Analytic models of design iteration.- 2.1.1 Models based on the concurrent engineering paradigm.- 2.1.2 Models based on queuing theory.- 2.1.3 Models based on the design structure matrix.- 2.2 Models based on complexity theory.- 2.3 Models from the empirical or descriptive literature.- 2.4 Models based on the simulation of agent populations.- 2.5 Summary.- 3 Model Description.- 3.1 Structure of the NPD process.- 3.2 Component performance and interdependence.- 3.2.1 Influence of the individual decision maker on the component.- 3.2.2 Influence of other decision makers on the component.- 3.2.2.1 Influence on the optimal component decision.- 3.2.2.2 Influence on the component performance.- 3.2.2.2.1 Piecewise linear formulation of bounds.- 3.2.2.2.2 Boundary conditions as error function.- 3.2.2.3 Interaction of influences.- 3.2.3 Performance of the individual decision maker.- 3.2.4 Total performance of the NPD network.- 3.3 Role of time.- 3.3.1 Decision making and time.- 3.3.2 Communication and time.- 3.4 Decision making and coordination.- 3.4.1 Decisions of the uncooperative decision maker.- 3.4.2 Decisions of the cooperative decision maker.- 3.4.2.1 Optimization in the piecewise linear case.- 3.4.2.2 Optimization in the error function case.- 3.5 Model discussion.- 3.5.1 Model limitations.- 3.5.2 Model characteristics in view of the NK model.- 4 Analytic Results.- 4.1 Closed form analysis for the base case.- 4.2 Numerical example.- 4.3 Implications for the base case.- 5 Simulation Results.- 5.1 Definition of simulation technicalities.- 5.2 Simulation results.- 5.2.1 Base case.- 5.2.2 Cooperation among agents.- 5.2.2.1 Cooperation among agents assuming piecewise linear boundary conditions.- 5.2.2.2 Cooperation among agents assuming erf-boundary conditions.- 5.2.3 Instantaneous broadcast of decisions among agents.- 5.2.4 Communication of preliminary information.- 5.2.5 Networks not fully connected.- 5.2.6 Equivoque.- 5.2.7 Robustness of model and results.- 6 Discussion and Conclusion.- A Properties of the Error Function.- B Simulation Data.- B.1 Data for the base series of simulations (25,000 time units).- B.2 Data for the 10,000 time units verification run.- B.3 Data for the 40,000 time units verification run.- C Program Listing.- C.1 Base case.- C.2 Adaptations for instantaneous broadcast.- C.3 Adaptations for the simulation of cooperation.- C.4 Adaptations for the error function case.- C.5 Adaptations for the depleted case.
「Nielsen BookData」 より