The reception of the Galilean science of motion in seventeenth-century Europe
著者
書誌事項
The reception of the Galilean science of motion in seventeenth-century Europe
(Boston studies in the philosophy of science, v. 239)
Kluwer Academic Publishers, c2004
- : hbk
- : e-book
大学図書館所蔵 全19件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. 261-270
Includes index
内容説明・目次
- 巻冊次
-
: hbk ISBN 9781402024542
内容説明
This book has evolved out of a colloquium entitled "The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion;' held at Amsterdam on 5-7 July 2000. It was our intention as the organizers to bring together historians of science interested in Galileo's science of motion, its ramifications in seventeenth-century Europe, and its impact on what Anneliese Maier and E. J. Dijksterhuis have labeled the "mechanization of the world picture. " Funding for the conference was provided by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, which honored our proposal for an Academy Colloquium. We should also like to thank Ap de Wit, Martine Wagenaar, and Ine van den Heuvel from the Royal Academy for the careful and reliable administrative organization of the colloquium. Through a generous grant (no. 200-22-295), the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research ( NWO) allowed the Center for Medieval and Renaissance Natural Philosophy at Nijmegen University to act as the colloquium's second sponsor. All papers that were read at the colloquium have been strongly modified for publication.
It is hoped that the resulting articles display even more coherence and unity than the colloquium did, while at the same time retaining something of its spirit and diversity. In addition to the authors whose articles are published here, the following scholars also participated in the discussions: Constance Blackwell, Hans Bots, Henk Braakhuis, Wiep van Bunge, Dirk-Jan Dekker, Fokko-Jan Dijksterhuis, Juliette van den Elsen, Fran'Tois de Gandt, Christoph Luthy, Olaf Pluta, Thomas Settle, Theo Verbeek, and Liesbeth de Wreede.
目次
Preface
List of Contributors
Carla Rita Palmerino: Introduction
Alan Gabbey: What Was 'Mechanical' about 'The Mechanical Philosophy'?
Sophie Roux: Cartesian Mechanics
William R. Shea: The 'Rational' Descartes and the 'Empirical' Galileo
H. Floris Cohen: A Historical-Analytical Framework for the Controversies over Galileo's Conception of Motion
Jochen Buttner, Peter Damerow, Jurgen Renn: Galileo's Unpublished Treatises. A case study on the role of shared knowledge in the emergence and dissemination of an early modern 'new science'
Enrico Giusti: A Master and his Pupils: Theories of Motion in the Galilean School
Carla Rita Palmerino: Galileo's Theories of Free Fall and Projectile Motion as Interpreted by Pierre Gassendi
Cees Leijenhorst: Hobbes and the Galilean Law of Free Fall
Christiane Vilain: Christiaan Huygens' Galilean Mechanics
Wallace Hooper: Seventeenth Century Theories of the Tides as a Gauge of Scientific Change
Michel Blay: Mathematization of the Science of Motion at the Turn of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: Pierre Varignon
Bibliography
Index
- 巻冊次
-
: e-book ISBN 9781402024559
内容説明
This book collects contributions by some of the leading scholars working on seventeenth-century mechanics and the mechanical philosophy. Together, the articles provide a broad and accurate picture of the fortune of Galileo's theory of motion in Europe and of the various physical, mathematical, and ontological arguments that were used in favour and against it. Were Galileo's contemporaries really aware of what Westfall has described as "the incompatibility between the demands of mathematical mechanics and the needs of mechanical philosophy"? To what extent did Galileo's silence concerning the cause of free fall impede the acceptance of his theory of motion? Which methods were used, before the invention if the infinitesimal calculus, to check the validity of Galileo's laws of free fall and of parabolic motion? And what sorts of experiments were invoked in favour or against these laws? These and related questions are addressed in this volume.
「Nielsen BookData」 より