The unity of mistakes : a phenomenological interpretation of medical work
著者
書誌事項
The unity of mistakes : a phenomenological interpretation of medical work
Temple University Press, 2004
大学図書館所蔵 全2件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
"First published 1988. Reissued with a new foreword 2004"--T.p. verso
Includes bibliographical references (p. 163-175) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Marianne Paget's The Unity of Mistakes has long been considered a landmark text on the nature of medical error. Paget-who herself died because of a medical error-argued that mistakes are an intrinsic part of the clinical process. Encompassing a much wider range of error than the terms \u0022malpractice,\u0022 \u0022incompetence,\u0022or \u0022negligence\u0022 denote, The Unity of Mistakes takes an existential view of medical work in which things go wrong as a matter of course, and probes what Paget called the \u0022complex sorrow\u0022that can result when things do go wrong. This new paperback edition contains a Foreword by Joan Cassell, anthropologist and author of Expected Miracles: Surgeons at Work. \u0022I began this study when I became aware of the anguish of clinical action and of the moral ambiguity of being a clinician, a person who acts, acts sometimes mistakenly, and, therefore, lives with the experience of being wrong.\u0022 With this statement, Marianne Paget introduces her study of medical mistakes and their meaning. Using as her \u0022text\u0022 in-depth interviews with forty doctors, she explores the subjective experience of physicians who inevitably make mistakes.
Marianne Paget argues that mistakes are an intrinsic feature of medical work which she calls an error-ridden activity. Mistakes involve action and action contains risk. Since medical mistakes put at risk human beings (not just the acted upon but the actors), her concern is with the subtle effects this endemic danger has upon clinical work. Through close textual analysis, the author examines the ways in which particular actions (which seemed right at the time) are recognized as errors and responded to. Her study encompasses a much wider range of error than the terms \u0022malpractice,\u0022 \u0022incompetence,\u0022 or \u0022negligence\u0022 denote. She takes an existential view of medical work in which things go wrong as a matter of course and probes what she calls the \u0022complex sorrow\u0022 that can result.
目次
ForewordAcknowledgments1. The Language of Mistakes2. Language Departures3. Acting-as-If4. The Semantic Sense of Mistakes5. A Language of Intention6. The Complex Sorrow of Clinical Work7. The Unity of MistakesNotesReferencesIndex
「Nielsen BookData」 より