Interpreting epidemiologic evidence : strategies for study design and analysis

Author(s)

    • Savitz, David A.

Bibliographic Information

Interpreting epidemiologic evidence : strategies for study design and analysis

David A. Savitz

Oxford University Press, c2003

Available at  / 9 libraries

Search this Book/Journal

Note

Includes bibliographical references and index

Description and Table of Contents

Description

Evaluating the strength or persuasiveness of epidemiologic evidence is inherently challenging, both for those new to the field and for experienced researchers. There is a myriad of potential biases to consider, but little guidance about how to assess the likely impact on study results. This book offers a strategy for assessing epidemiologic research findings, explicitly describing the goals and products of epidemiologic research in order to better evaluate its successes and limitations. The focus throughout is on practical tools for making optimal use of available data to assess whether hypothesised biases are operative and to anticipate concerns at the point of study design in order to ensure that needed information is generated. Specific tools for assessing the presence and impact of selection bias in both cohort and case-control studies, bias from non-response, confounding, exposure measurement error, disease measurement error, and random error are identified and evaluated. The potential value of each approach as well as its limitations are discussed, using examples from the published literature. Such information should help those who generate and interpret epidemiologic research to apply methodological principles more effectively to substantive issues, leading to a more accurate appraisal of the current evidence and greater clarity about research needs.

Table of Contents

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. The Nature of Epidemiologic Evidence
  • 3. Strategy for Drawing Inferences from Epidemiologic Evidence
  • 4. Selection Bias in Cohort Studies
  • 5. Selection Bias in Case-Control Studies
  • 6. Bias Due to Loss of Study Participants
  • 7. Confounding
  • 8. Measurement and Classification of Exposure
  • 9. Measurement and Classification of Disease
  • 10. Random Error
  • 11. Integration of Evidence across Studies
  • 12. Characterization of Conclusions

by "Nielsen BookData"

Details

Page Top