Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement
著者
書誌事項
Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement
National Academy Press, c2002
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全2件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
"Board on testing and assessment, Center for education, Division of behavioral and social sciences and education, National Research Council" --T.p. verso
"Papers and discussions from a public symposium held by the Board on International Comparative Studies in Education (BICSE) of the National Research Council in November 2000"--T.p. verso
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In November 2000, the Board on International Comparative Studies in Education (BICSE) held a symposium to draw on the wealth of experience gathered over a four--decade period, to evaluate improvement in the quality of the methodologies used in international studies, and to identify the most pressing methodological issues that remain to be solved. Since 1960, the United States has participated in 15 large--scale cross--national education surveys. The most assessed subjects have been science and mathematics through reading comprehension, geography, nonverbal reasoning, literature, French, English as a foreign language, civic education, history, computers in education, primary education, and second--language acquisition. The papers prepared for this symposium and discussions of those papers make up the volume, representing the most up--to--date and comprehensive assessment of methodological strengths and weaknesses of international comparative studies of student achievement. These papers answer the following questions: (1) What is the methodological quality of the most recent international surveys of student achievement? How authoritative are the results?
(2) Has the methodological quality of international achievement studies improved over the past 40 years? and (3) What are promising opportunities for future improvement?
目次
- 1 Front Matter
- 2 1. Progress and Challenges for Large-Scale Studies
- 3 2. The Measurement of Student Achievement in International Studies
- 4 3. Adapting Achievement Tests into Multiple Languages for International Assessments
- 5 4. Sampling Issues in Design, Conduct, and Interpretation of International Comparative Studies of School Achievement
- 6 5. Cultural-Cognitive Issues in Academic Achievement: New Directions for Cross-National Research
- 7 6. Measuring Family Background in International Studies of Education: Conceptual Issues and Methodological Challenges
- 8 7. Advancements in Conceptualizing and Analyzing Cultural Effects in Cross-National Studies of Educational Achievement
- 9 8. The Measurement of Opportunity to Learn
- 10 9. Statistical Issues in Analysis of International Comparisons of Educational Achievement
- 11 10. Drawing Inferences for National Policy from Large-Scale Cross-National Education Surveys
- 12 11. Large-Scale, Cross-National Surceys of Educational Achievement: Promises, Pitfalls, and Possibilities
- 13 Appendix A: Symposium Agenda and Participants
- 14 Appendix B: Biographical Sketches of Board Members
- 15 Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より