Journalism worthy of the name : freedom within the press and the affirmative side of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Journalism worthy of the name : freedom within the press and the affirmative side of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights
(The Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library, v. 21)
M. Nijhoff, 2005
Available at 8 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Based on the author's doctoral thesis from the Faculty of Law, Lund University, 2003
Includes bibliographical references (p. 537-553) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
The subject of this study is 'freedom within the press', the nature and limits of the protection afforded to the journalistic imparting process, which has been a neglected area of research. The analysis draws on the classical defenders of freedom of speech, Milton and Mill, to show that at the dawn of the 21st century the intertwined alliance between big business and public authorities resulting in the widespread phenomena of self-censorship within the media constitutes an almost insurmountable obstacle. Instead of enlightening the public and inspiring the individual the press may be contributing to an inert public and individual cowardice antithetical to the objectives of human dignity and democracy.
The core of the problem is that prima facie the infringement of freedom within the media is not exercised on legal premises and cannot therefore be solved within the legal framework. The operation of the press in society is conditioned by three types of regulation, legal regulation, market regulation and self-regulation. Legal regulation does not adequately presuppose the impact of the latter as it is based on the assumption that press freedom is mainly a negative liberty.
The book explores the affirmative side of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights to guarantee press freedom that is not merely illusory but practical and effective. Convention jurisprudence has not only influenced the domestic courts of the Contracting Parties but also the legislators of the Member States. In an era of globalization dominant media operators wield power in their own domestic markets to impede national regulators in adopting interventionist media policies to secure journalistic freedoms. The Convention jurisprudence represents a kind of European ius commune, which is here set in the context of an analysis reflecting the problems and values at issue and offering recommendations to alleviate a situation which threatens democratic ideals and public-spirited journalism.
Table of Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- I Subject and Terminology
- II Method
- III Scope
- IV Purpose
- PART I THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION AND ITS PUBLIC WATCHDOG
- Introduction
- Chapter 1: Article 10 and the Press
- Chapter 2: The Democratic Right to Receive
- Chapter 3: Opinion, Journalism and Dignity
- Chapter 4: The Vital Role of Imparting
- PART II FREEDOM WITHIN THE MEDIA: THE DILEMMA OF AN 'IRON CAGE'
- Introduction
- Chapter 5: Self-Censorship in Journalism
- Chapter 6: The Proprietor's Position
- Chapter 7: The Political Nature of Advertising
- Chapter 8: Self-Regulation Contested
- PART III JOURNALISM WORTHY OF THE NAME
- Introduction
- Chapter 9: Affirmative Action on the Basis of Article 10
- Table of Cases
- Table of Legislation
- Bibliography
- Index.
by "Nielsen BookData"