Archaeology as a process : processualism and its progeny
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Archaeology as a process : processualism and its progeny
University of Utah Press, c2005
- : cloth
- : pbk
Available at 9 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 271-340) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
The publication in 1962 of Lew Binford's paper Archaeology as Anthropology is generally considered to mark the birth of processualism - a critical turning point in American archaeology. In the hands of Binford and other young University of Chicago graduates of the 1960s, this new archaeology became the mainstream approach in the U.S. The realignment that the processualists proposed was so thorough that its effects are still being felt. Predictably, processualism also spun off a number of other isms, several of which grew up to challenge its supremacy.
Archaeology as a Process traces the intellectual history of Americanist archaeology in terms of the research groups that were at the forefront of these various approaches, concentrating as much on the archaeologists as it does on method and theory, thus setting it apart from other treatments published in the last fifteen years.
Peppered with rare photographs of well-known archaeologists in some interesting settings, the book documents the swirl and excitement of archaeological controversy for the past forty years with over 1,600 references and an in-depth treatment of all the major intellectual approaches. In the process, the contributors examine how archaeology is conducted - the ins and outs of how various groups work to promote themselves - and how personal ambition and animosities can function to further rather than to retard the development of the discipline.
by "Nielsen BookData"