Case studies in criminal procedure
著者
書誌事項
Case studies in criminal procedure
Pearson Prentice Hall, c2006
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全1件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Bibliography: p. 199
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This case book focuses on federal consitutional principles, and specifically focuses on how those principles work. The introductory comments to each chapter refresh the students' memories of the rules and the reasons the rules were established. The students are then challenged to evaluate what was done in each case, and analyze whether it was consitutional or not. These materials are instructive for students of consitutional law and for police who are required to know how to investigate constitutionally.
目次
1.0 Federalism
1.1 State v. Cuntapay (Haw. 2004)
1.2 State v. Martinez (Mont 2003)
2.0 Privacy
2.1 United State v. Longoria (10th Cir. 1999)
Privacy
2.2 State v. Torgrimson (Mn.Ct.App. 2002)
Stop and Frisk
Probable Cause
2.3 Randolph v. State (Ga.Ct.App 2003)
2.4 United States v. Haqq (2d Cir. 2002)
2.5 United States v. Berryhill (6th Cir. 2003)
2.6 People v. Stewart (Cal.Ct.App. 2003)
2.7 United States v. Miravalles (11th Cir. 2002)
2.8 United States v. Slanina (5th Cir. 2002)
United States v. Angevine (10th Cir. 2002)
2.9 United States v. Gill (9th Cir. 2002)
3.0 Probable Cause
3.1 United States v. Sparks (10th Cir. 2002)
Search
3.2 United States v. Jackson (7th Cir. 2002)
Search
Hearsay
3.3 State v. Wallace (Md. 2002)
Search
3.4 State v. Nordlund (Wash.Ct.App. 2002)
Search
3.5 State v. Marks (Mont. 2002)
Search
3.6 McKay v. State (Md.Ct.Spec.App. 2002)
Search
3.7 Commonwealth v. Smith (Mass.App.Ct. 2003)
Search
3.8 Ball v. United States (D.C. 2002)
Search
Plain Feel
3.9 People v. Pressey (Cal.Ct.App. 2002)
Search
Good Faith
3.10 State v. Steelman (Tex.Crim.App. 2002)
Arrest
3.11 State v. Hills (La. 2002)
Arrest
3.12 State v. Comer (Utah Ct.App. 2002)
Arrest
Exigent Circumstances
4.0 Arrest
4.1 United States v. Axsom (8th Cir. 2002)
4.2 State v. Randolph (Tenn. 2002)
Federalism
4.3 People c. Hellman (Colo. 2002)
4.4 People v. Gherna (Ill. 2003)
4.5 Keenom v. State (Ark. 2002)
4.6 State v. Bently (Idaho 1999)
4.7 People v. Cascio (Colo. 1997)
4.8 State v. Norris (Ohio Ct.App. 1999)
Hot Pursuit
4.9 United States v. Jerez (7th Cir. 1997)
Arrest v. Stop
4.10 Washington v. Lambert (9th Cir. 1997)
Stop
4.11 McGee v. Commonwealth (Va.Ct.App. 1996)
Consent
5.0 Search and Search Warrants
5.1 United States v. Husband (7th Cir. 2002)
Search
5.2 United States v. Owens (D.C. 2002)
Search: Knock-and-Announce
5.3 Commonwealth v. Jimenez (Mass. 2002)
Search: No Knock
5.4 Commonwealth v. Seng (Mass. 2002)
Inventory Search
5.5 State v. Hendricks (Kan.Ct.App. 2003)
Search Warrant
Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Exception
5.6 State v. Garcia (N.M.Ct.App. 2002)
Search Warrant: Nighttime
5.7 Ilo v. State (Ark. 2002)
Search Warrant: Staleness
Search: Knock-and-Announce
6.0 Exclusionary Rule: Operation and Extension to Secondary Evidence
6.1 State v. Ford (Ohio Ct.App. 2002)
6.2 United States v. Keszthelyi (6th Cir. 2002)
Inevitable Discovery
6.3 People v. Hamilton (Cal.Ct.App. 2002)
Good Faith Exception
6.4 State v. Tye (Wis. 2002)
Good Faith Exception
6.5 People v. Gonzales (Ill.App.Ct. 1994)
Fruit-of-the-Poisonous Tree
6.6 United States v. Akridge (6th Cir. 2003)
Attenuation
6.7 Haynes v. State (Ark. 2003)
Inevitable Discovery
6.8 State v. Flippo (W.Va. 2002)
Inevitable Discovery
6.9 United States v. Rhiger (10th Cir. 2003)
Exigent Circumstances
6.10 United States v. Holloway (11th Cir. 2002)
Exigent Circumstances
Probable Cause
6.11 State v. Davis (Conn.App.Ct. 2002)
Exigent Circumstances
Pre-trial Identification
6.12 United States v. Davis (10th Cir. 2002)
Exigent Circumstances
6.13 United States v. Howard (5th Cir. 1997)
Exigent Circumstances
6.14 People v. Lewis (Colo. 1999)
Fruit-of-the-Poisonous Tree
Exigent Circumstances
Pre-Trial Identification
6.15 United States v. Blount (5th Cir. 1996)
Exigent Circumstances
Protective Sweep
Open Fields
Probable Cause
Hot Pursuit
6.16 Middletown, Ohio v. Flinchum (Ohio 2002)
Hot Pursuit
7.0 Stop and Frisk Exception
7.1 State v. Duncan (Wash. 2002)
Reasonable Suspicion
7.2 Commonwealth v. Huff (Pa.Super.Ct. 2003)
Stop: Reasonable Suspicion
7.3 Ransome v. State (Md. 2003)
Frisk: Reasonable Suspicion
7.4 United States v. Townsend
Stop
7.5 Gallegos v. Los Angeles (9th Cir. 2002)
Stop v. Arrest
7.6 State v. DeLaRosa (S.D. 2003)
Stop: Canine Sniff
7.7 State v. Wiegand (Minn. 2002)
Stop: Canine Sniff
7.8 United States v. Yousif (8th Cir. 2002)
Stop
Consent
7.9 State v. Loffer (Ohio Ct.App. 2003)
Frisk: Plain Feel
7.10 Murphy v. Commonwealth
Frisk: Plain Feel
8.0 Search Incident to Arrest Exception
8.1 United States v. Bookhardt (D.C. Cir. 2002)
8.2 State v. Hardaway (Mont. 2001)
Federalism
8.3 United States v. Tobon-Sierra (D.C.N.Y. 1997)
8.4 State v. Wells (Utah Ct.App. 1996)
Scope of Search
8.5 State v. Spencer (Conn. 2004)
Protective Sweep
9.0 Consent Exception
9.1 Maxwell v. State (Tex.Crim.App. 2002)
Authority
9.2 State v. West (Ga.Ct.App. 1999)
Authority
9.3 State v. Brauch (Idaho 1999)
Authority
9.4 Krise v. State (Ind.Ct.App. 1999)
Authority
9.5 United States v. Elliott (2d Cir. 1995)
Authority
9.6 State v. Benson (Idaho 1999)
Authority
9.7 State v. Frank (Minn.Ct.App. 2002)
Authority
9.8 Welch v. State (Tex.Crim.App. 2002)
Voluntariness
9.9 United States v. Patten (10th Cir. 1999)
Voluntariness
9.10 State v. McCord (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 2002)
Voluntariness
9.11 United States v. Rich (5th Cir. 1993)
Scope of Search
9.12 Edwards v. Commonwealth (Va.Ct.App. 2002)
Scope of Search
9.13 United States v. Mendoza-Gonzales (5th Cir. 2003)
Scope of Search
9.14 United States v. Al-Marri (S.D.N.Y. 2002)
Scope of Search
9.15 State v. Troxell (Tenn. 2002)
Scope of Search
9.16 United States v. Pierre (5th Cir. 1991)
Consent
Automobile Exception
Plain View Exception
Search Incident to Arrest
10.0 Plain View Exception
10.1 Commonwealth v. Balicki (Mass. 2002)
Inadvertent Discovery
Federalism
10.2 State v. Green (N.C.Ct.App. 2001)
Observation
Search Probable Cause
10.3 United States v. $557,933.98 (2d Cir. 2002)
Observation
Search Probable Cause
11.0 Automobile Exceptions
11.1 United States v. Mercado (10th Cir. 2002)
Probable Cause
Mobility
11.2 Black v. State (Ind.App.Ct. 2003)
Probable Cause
Mobility
11.3 State v. Branham (Ariz.Ct.App.,Div. 1 1997)
Probable Cause
Consent
12.0 Open Field Exception
12.1 People v. Pitman (Ill. 2004)
12.2 United States v. Hatfield (10th Cir. 2003)
13.0 Admissions and Confessions
13.1 State v. Anson (Wis.Ct.App. 2002)
13.2 In re D.F.L. (Colo. 1997)
Search
13.3 Sterns County, Minn. V. Hannon (Minn. 2001)
Federalism
13.4 Alvarez v. Gomez (9th Cir. 1999)
Miranda
13.5 People v. Gonzales (Colo. 1999)
Miranda
13.6 Hill v. Brigano (6th Cir. 1999)
Miranda
13.7 Clark v. Murphy (9th Cir. 2003)
Miranda
13.8 Cooper v. State (Ga.Ct.App. 2002)
Miranda
13.9 Wilson v. State (Ga. 2002)
Miranda
13.10 United States v. Clemons (D.D.C. 2002)
Custody
13.11 State v. Stott (N.J. 2002)
Custody
Privacy
13.12 State v. Spaulding (Ohio Ct.App. 2002)
"Interrogation"
13.13 Ball v. State (Md.Ct.App. 1997)
Voluntariness
13.14 Sabo v. Commonwealth (Va.Ct.App. 2002)
Voluntariness
13.15 Whittington v. State (Md.Ct.App. 1999)
Volunatriness
13.16 United States v. Syslo (8th Cirt. 2002)
Voluntariness
13.17 Mitchell v. Commonwealth (Va.Ct.App. 1999)
Waiver
13.18 Jackson v. Litscher (E.D. Wis. 2002)
Waiver
13.19 Roehling v. State (Ind.Ct.App. 2002)
Consent
Automobile Exception
14.0 Pre-Trail Indentification
14.1 State v. McMorris (Wis. 1997)
Right to Counsel
Due Process
14.2 State v. Williams (Iowa Ct.App. 2000)
Due Process
14.3 People v. Ortiz (N.Y.Ct.App. 1997)
Due Process
15.0 Effective Assistance of Counsel
15.1 United States v. Mullins (5th Cir. 2002)
15.2 United States v. Holman (7th Cir. 2002)
15.3 Payne v. State (S.C. 2003)
15.4 Ouber v. Guarino (1st Cir. 20020
15.5 State v. Robinson (Wash. 1999)
15.6 Lettley v. State (Md. 2000)
Deficient Performance
15.7 People v. Berroa (N.Y. 2002)
Deficient Performance
15.8 Scapa v. DeBois (1st Cir. 1994)
Prejudice
15.9 State v. Hunt, 254 Neb. 865 (1998)
Prejudice
「Nielsen BookData」 より
