Punishment : the supposed justifications revisited
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Punishment : the supposed justifications revisited
Pluto Press, 2006
Rev. ed
- : pbk
- : hbk
Available at / 6 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 229-244) and index
Originally published: 4th ed. : Polity Press, 1989
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Ted Honderich's Punishment is the best-known book on the justifications put forward for state punishment.
This enlarged and developed edition brings his writing to a new audience. With new chapters on determinism and responsibility, plus a new conclusion, the book also remains true to its original realism about almost all talk of retribution and proportionality. Honderich investigates all the commonsensical notions of why and when punishment is morally necessary, engaging with the language of public debate by politicians and other public figures. Honderich then puts forward his own argument that punishment is legitimate when it is in accord with the principle of humanity.
Written in a clear, sharp style and seasoned with a dry wit, this is the most important work on the reasoning behind our penal systems. It is a pleasure to read for philosophers and non-philosophers alike.
Table of Contents
Introduction
1 Problem
2 Backward-Looking Theories
3 Grievance-Satisfaction
4 Utilitarian Prevention Theory, Etc.
5. Reform, Rehabilitation, Treatment
6. Determinism
7 Compromise Theories of Punishment
8 Non-Problem, Other Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Notes
Index
by "Nielsen BookData"
