Understanding terrorism in South Asia : beyond statist discourses
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Understanding terrorism in South Asia : beyond statist discourses
Manohar, c2006
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
-
Graduate School of Asian and African Area Studies, Kyoto Universityグローバル専攻
COE-SA||316.4||Ahm||70511156200013594849
Note
Includes bibliographical references and indexes
"Regional Centre for Strategic Studies, Colombo"-- on t.p.
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Colombo Terrorism is now an over-defined concept with the state, intellectuals, dissenters, and anti-state activists constantly battling out its meaning. "While analysing terrorism the authors of this volume have tried to highlight the following contentions. First, both state and non-state actors are culpable when it comes to reproducing terrorism, although as a policy the state was the first to institutionalise it. Second, the colonial state was notorious when it came to reproducing terrorism, not merely for channelling its coercive machineries but for institutionalising terrorism as a matter of state policy. Third, non-state terrorism during the colonial era remained qualitatively different from the post-colonial era mainly for the practice of keeping out civil society from influencing state policy. Fourth, states policy of counter-terrorism proved more counter productive in tackling non-state terrorism. Fifth, modern weapons technology has virtually re conceptualised terrorism, not only nationally but also internationally.
Sixth, while the state resorted to terrorism mainly for containing the power of dissenting subalterns, the latter also through acts of terrorism found convenient to project its grievances against the state. Seventh, misgovernance of the state, marginality of communities, and national deprivation, all contribute directly to the reproduction of non-state terrorism. Finally, globalisation has provided fresh impetus to terrorism in terms of international networks and the supply of materials. Published in association with Regional Centre for Strategic Studies.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Colonial State, Terror, & Law
- The State & the Limits of Counter-Terrorism I: The Experience of Pakistan & Sri Lanka
- The State & the Limits of Counter-Terrorism II: The Experience of India & Bangladesh
- Weapons Technology & the Reconceptualization of Terrorism
- Terrorism & Subalternity I: The Misgovernance Syndrome in Sri Lanka
- Terrorism & Subalternity II: The Marginalization Syndrome in Nepal
- Terrorism & Subalternity III: India & the Sub-nationalist Movements in Mizoram & Nagaland
- Unthinking the Terrorism -- Globalization Nexus
- Index.
by "Nielsen BookData"